» Articles » PMID: 39015065

Care Partner-informed Meaningful Change Thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for Trials of Early Alzheimer's Disease

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2024 Jul 17
PMID 39015065
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Consensus definitions of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) on the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) are needed. Existing estimates use clinician-rated anchors in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease (AD) populations. Incorporating the care partner perspective offers important insights, and evaluating biomarker-confirmed cohorts aligns estimates with ongoing trials.

Methods: Anchor-based analyses were conducted to evaluate MWPC on the CDR-SB in early AD (Tauriel; NCT03289143) using Caregiver Global Impression of Change in memory or daily activities.

Results: Across time points and anchors, mean CDR-SB changes associated with the "somewhat worse" category ranged from 1.50 to 2.12 in early AD, 1.07 to 2.06 in mild cognitive impairment-AD, and 1.79 to 2.25 in mild AD.

Discussion: The proposed ranges are appropriate to define meaningful progression on the CDR-SB in similar cohorts and support the interpretation of treatment benefit through MWPC analyses. Thresholds should be calibrated to the context of use; lower/higher thresholds may be applicable in studies of earlier/later disease over shorter/longer durations.

Highlights: Within-patient CDR-SB change thresholds are provided using caregiver-rated anchors. 1.5 to 2.5 points may be an appropriate range in early AD trials of similar durations. Cumulative distribution function plots illustrate the benefit of a given treatment. When selecting thresholds, the target population and study design should be considered.

Citing Articles

Perspective: Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Cummings J Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025; 11(1):e70059.

PMID: 40065918 PMC: 11891559. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.70059.


Appropriate use of meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds in Alzheimer's disease.

Lansdall C, Cummings J, Andrews J Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 21(2):e14436.

PMID: 39692602 PMC: 11848208. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14436.


Clinical Meaningfulness in Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials. A Report from the EU-US CTAD Task Force.

Angioni D, Cummings J, Lansdall C, Middleton L, Sampaio C, Gauthier S J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024; 11(5):1219-1227.

PMID: 39350367 PMC: 11446471. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2024.112.


Care partner-informed meaningful change thresholds for the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes for trials of early Alzheimer's disease.

Lansdall C, Teng E, Chague J, Palanganda R, Delmar P, Smith J Alzheimers Dement. 2024; 20(9):5889-5900.

PMID: 39015065 PMC: 11497679. DOI: 10.1002/alz.14050.

References
1.
McDougall F, Edgar C, Mertes M, Delmar P, Fontoura P, Abi-Saab D . Psychometric Properties of the Clinical Dementia Rating - Sum of Boxes and Other Cognitive and Functional Outcomes in a Prodromal Alzheimer's Disease Population. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021; 8(2):151-160. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2020.73. View

2.
Wyrwich K, Tierney W, Wolinsky F . Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(9):861-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00071-2. View

3.
Lansdall C, McDougall F, Butler L, Delmar P, Pross N, Qin S . Establishing Clinically Meaningful Change on Outcome Assessments Frequently Used in Trials of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023; 10(1):9-18. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2022.102. View

4.
Schmier J, Halpern M . Patient recall and recall bias of health state and health status. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009; 4(2):159-63. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.4.2.159. View

5.
Hays R, Brodsky M, Johnston M, Spritzer K, Hui K . Evaluating the statistical significance of health-related quality-of-life change in individual patients. Eval Health Prof. 2005; 28(2):160-71. DOI: 10.1177/0163278705275339. View