» Articles » PMID: 39003476

Enhancing Sepsis Biomarker Development: Key Considerations from Public and Private Perspectives

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Jul 13
PMID 39003476
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Implementation of biomarkers in sepsis and septic shock in emergency situations, remains highly challenging. This viewpoint arose from a public-private 3-day workshop aiming to facilitate the transition of sepsis biomarkers into clinical practice. The authors consist of international academic researchers and clinician-scientists and industry experts who gathered (i) to identify current obstacles impeding biomarker research in sepsis, (ii) to outline the important milestones of the critical path of biomarker development and (iii) to discuss novel avenues in biomarker discovery and implementation. To define more appropriately the potential place of biomarkers in sepsis, a better understanding of sepsis pathophysiology is mandatory, in particular the sepsis patient's trajectory from the early inflammatory onset to the late persisting immunosuppression phase. This time-varying host response urges to develop time-resolved test to characterize persistence of immunological dysfunctions. Furthermore, age-related difference has to be considered between adult and paediatric septic patients. In this context, numerous barriers to biomarker adoption in practice, such as lack of consensus about diagnostic performances, the absence of strict recommendations for sepsis biomarker development, cost and resources implications, methodological validation challenges or limited awareness and education have been identified. Biomarker-guided interventions for sepsis to identify patients that would benefit more from therapy, such as sTREM-1-guided Nangibotide treatment or Adrenomedullin-guided Enibarcimab treatment, appear promising but require further evaluation. Artificial intelligence also has great potential in the sepsis biomarker discovery field through capability to analyse high volume complex data and identify complex multiparametric patient endotypes or trajectories. To conclude, biomarker development in sepsis requires (i) a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach employing the most advanced analytical tools, (ii) the creation of a platform that collaboratively merges scientific and commercial needs and (iii) the support of an expedited regulatory approval process.

Citing Articles

Molecular Biomarkers and More Efficient Therapies for Sepsis.

Su W, Chiu S, Shen C, Chen Y Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002880 PMC: 11852965. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020468.


Sepsis: the evolution of molecular pathogenesis concepts and clinical management.

Feng Z, Wang L, Yang J, Li T, Liao X, Kang Y MedComm (2020). 2025; 6(3):e70109.

PMID: 39991626 PMC: 11847631. DOI: 10.1002/mco2.70109.


Unraveling the immunological landscape and gut microbiome in sepsis: a comprehensive approach to diagnosis and prognosis.

Luo Y, Gao J, Su X, Li H, Li Y, Qi W EBioMedicine. 2025; 113:105586.

PMID: 39893935 PMC: 11835619. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105586.


Prognostic value of HSP27 in 28-day mortality in septic ICU patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Yao L, Fan Z, Yao F, Wang X Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1513788.

PMID: 39850096 PMC: 11755344. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1513788.


Crossing Age Boundaries: The Unifying Potential of Presepsin in Sepsis Diagnosis Across Diverse Age Groups.

de Moura E, Pereira R J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685497 PMC: 11641901. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237038.


References
1.
Libbrecht M, Noble W . Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2015; 16(6):321-32. PMC: 5204302. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3920. View

2.
Cajander S, Kox M, Scicluna B, Weigand M, Mora R, Flohe S . Profiling the dysregulated immune response in sepsis: overcoming challenges to achieve the goal of precision medicine. Lancet Respir Med. 2023; 12(4):305-322. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00330-2. View

3.
Teissier T, Boulanger E, Cox L . Interconnections between Inflammageing and Immunosenescence during Ageing. Cells. 2022; 11(3). PMC: 8834134. DOI: 10.3390/cells11030359. View

4.
Fukuzumi N, Osawa K, Sato I, Iwatani S, Ishino R, Hayashi N . Age-specific percentile-based reference curve of serum procalcitonin concentrations in Japanese preterm infants. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:23871. PMC: 4817150. DOI: 10.1038/srep23871. View

5.
Fisher Jr C, Agosti J, Opal S, Lowry S, Balk R, Sadoff J . Treatment of septic shock with the tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein. The Soluble TNF Receptor Sepsis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(26):1697-702. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199606273342603. View