Complications and Adverse Events in Lymphadenectomy of the Inguinal Area: Worldwide Expert Consensus

Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group.

Methods: A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α.

Results: Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer.

Conclusion: The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer.

Citing Articles

Early and Late Complications Associated with Penile Cancer Surgery and the Impact of Human Papillomavirus Status: Findings from a Retrospective Norwegian Cohort Study.

Juliebo-Jones P, Nordanger I, Beisland C, Thorkelsen T, Honore A, Moen C Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025; 72:29-35.

PMID: 39996030 PMC: 11849643. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.009.

Role of Age, Comorbidity, and Frailty in the Prediction of Postoperative Complications After Surgery for Vulvar Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the Development of a Nomogram.

Delli Carpini G, Sopracordevole F, Cicoli C, Bernardi M, Giuliani L, Fichera M Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(1).

PMID: 39851937 PMC: 11763996. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32010021.

A Review of the Literature on Videoscopic and Robotic Inguinal-Iliac-Obturator Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Cutaneous Melanoma.

Matteucci M, Bruzzone P, Pinto S, Covarelli P, Boselli C, Popivanov G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685763 PMC: 11642167. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237305.

Surgical Textbook Outcomes in the Era of Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Skin Cancers.

Blonski P, Rutkowski P, Ostaszewski K, Krotewicz M, Czarnecka A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598066 PMC: 11594600. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226922.

References

Sholklapper T, Ballon J, Sayegh A, La Riva A, Perez L, Huang S . Bibliometric analysis of academic journal recommendations and requirements for surgical and anesthesiologic adverse events reporting. Int J Surg. 2023; 109(5):1489-1496. PMC: 10389352. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000323. View

Chua K, Balraj V, Patel H, Srivastava A, Doppalapudi S, Elsamra S . Wound Complication Rates after Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: Contemporary Analysis of the NSQIP Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2022; 236(1):18-25. PMC: 9764259. DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000438. View

Sood A, Rudzinski J, Spiess P, Pettaway C . The Acute Complications After Surgery for Penile Carcinoma and Strategies for Their Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2022; 38(3):151285. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151285. View

. The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2020 Consensus Document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology. 2020; 53(1):3-19. View

Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Molina Jr W, Forseto Jr P, Juliano R, Wroclawski E . Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL): minimally invasive resection of inguinal lymph nodes. Int Braz J Urol. 2006; 32(3):316-21. DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382006000300012. View

Soliman C, Mulholland C, Santaguida P, Sathianathen N, Lawrentschuk N, Giannarini G . Protocol for CAMUS Delphi Study: A Consensus on Comprehensive Reporting and Grading of Complications After Urological Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2022; 8(5):1493-1511. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.016. View

Sahinoglu E, Ergin G, Karadibak D . The agreement between three classification systems used to grade the severity of lymphedema in patients with upper and lower extremity lymphedema: A retrospective study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2022; 40(4):874-879. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2161080. View

Chang S, Askew R, Xing Y, Weaver S, Gershenwald J, Lee J . Prospective assessment of postoperative complications and associated costs following inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17(10):2764-72. PMC: 2943041. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1026-z. View

Gattrell W, Logullo P, van Zuuren E, Price A, Hughes E, Blazey P . ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Med. 2024; 21(1):e1004326. PMC: 10805282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. View

10.

Sayegh A, Eppler M, Sholklapper T, Goldenberg M, Perez L, La Riva A . Severity Grading Systems for Intraoperative Adverse Events. A Systematic Review of the Literature and Citation Analysis. Ann Surg. 2023; 278(5):e973-e980. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005883. View

11.

van Heumen S, Riksen J, Bramer W, van Soest G, Vasilic D . Imaging of the Lymphatic Vessels for Surgical Planning: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022; 30(1):462-479. PMC: 9726677. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12552-7. View

12.

Cacciamani G, Sholklapper T, Sotelo R, Desai M, Gill I . A Protocol for the Development of the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting With Universal Standards Criteria: The ICARUS Project. Int J Surg Protoc. 2021; 25(1):160-164. PMC: 8344953. DOI: 10.29337/ijsp.155. View

13.

Swetter S, Thompson J, Albertini M, Barker C, Baumgartner J, Boland G . NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021; 19(4):364-376. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0018. View

14.

Munoz Guillermo V, Rosino Sanchez A, Rivero Guerra A, Barcelo Bayonas I, Pardo Martinez A, Jimenez Peralta D . [Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: Systematic review.]. Arch Esp Urol. 2019; 72(10):992-999. View

15.

Cacciamani G, Sholklapper T, Delloglio P, Rocco B, Annino F, Antonelli A . The Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration Project: Development of Criteria for Reporting Adverse Events During Surgical Procedures and Evaluating Their Impact on the.... Eur Urol Focus. 2022; 8(6):1847-1858. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.018. View

16.

Hakenberg O, Comperat E, Minhas S, Necchi A, Protzel C, Watkin N . EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(1):142-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.017. View

17.

Shao Y, Hu X, Ren S, Liao D, Yang Z, Liu Y . Comparison of different surgical methods and strategies for inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2560. PMC: 8847572. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06494-z. View

18.

Cacciamani G, Medina L, Sayegh A, La Riva A, Perez L, Eppler M . Assessment and Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events and Complications in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma, Vulvar Cancer, and Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2023; 47(4):962-974. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06882-6. View

19.

Sayegh A, Eppler M, Ballon J, Hemal S, Goldenberg M, Sotelo R . Strategies for Improving the Standardization of Perioperative Adverse Events in Surgery and Anesthesiology: "The Long Road from Assessment to Collection, Grading and Reporting". J Clin Med. 2022; 11(17). PMC: 9457420. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175115. View

20.

Eppler M, Sayegh A, Goldenberg M, Sholklapper T, Hemal S, Cacciamani G . If You Know Them, You Avoid Them: The Imperative Need to Improve the Narrative Regarding Perioperative Adverse Events. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(17). PMC: 9457276. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11174978. View