Early and Late Complications Associated with Penile Cancer Surgery and the Impact of Human Papillomavirus Status: Findings from a Retrospective Norwegian Cohort Study

Overview

Journal Eur Urol Open Sci

Date 2025 Feb 25

PMID 39996030

Authors

Patrick Juliebo-Jones

Ida M Nordanger

Christian Beisland

Tor K Thorkelsen

Alfred Honore

Christian A Moen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Objective: Penile cancer (PeCa) and penile intraepithelial neoplasia (PeIN) are rare diseases, and the burden of complications associated with surgery remains under-reported. The objective was to evaluate the early (≤30 d) and late (>30 d) complications and the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) status.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of a cohort consisting of 201 consecutive and treatment-naïve patients with PeCa/PeIN undergoing surgery (penile sparing, and partial and total amputation) between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2023 at a tertiary centre as part of a centralised regional service.

Key Findings And Limitations: The median follow-up time was 39 (interquartile range 21, 76) mo. The early and late patient complication rates were 45% and 38%, respectively. Of the patients, 18.5% experienced two or more early complications. A majority (80%) of early complications were minor (Clavien-Dindo ≤2). There was a 1% admission rate to the intensive care unit, but no deaths were recorded within 30 d. Body mass index (BMI)was a significant predictor of early complications ( = 0.01). Late complications included chronic wound irritation (10%) and urethral stricture (11%). The latter was highest among those who had undergone partial amputation. One in four patients underwent reoperation due to recurrence during follow-up. HPV status had no association with the rate of either early or late complications.

Conclusions And Clinical Implications: PeCa surgery is associated with a relatively high complication burden, in both the early and the late postoperative period. Lymph node surgery further adds to the morbidity profile. BMI was a significant predictor of having an early complication, while HPV status did not affect the rate of early or late complications.

Patient Summary: Penile cancer surgery is associated with a high rate of complications in early as well as late postoperative period. However, most of these complications are not severe. Body mass index was a significant predictor of an early complication, but human papillomavirus status was not associated with the risk of complications.

References

Pietrzak P, Corbishley C, Watkin N . Organ-sparing surgery for invasive penile cancer: early follow-up data. BJU Int. 2004; 94(9):1253-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05153.x. View

Cacciamani G, Medina L, Sayegh A, La Riva A, Perez L, Eppler M . Assessment and Reporting of Perioperative Adverse Events and Complications in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma, Vulvar Cancer, and Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2023; 47(4):962-974. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06882-6. View

Jeanne-Julien A, Bouchot O, De Vergie S, Branchereau J, Perrouin-Verbe M, Rigaud J . Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer. World J Urol. 2022; 41(1):109-118. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04169-y. View

Thomas A, Necchi A, Muneer A, Tobias-Machado M, Tran A, Van Rompuy A . Penile cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021; 7(1):11. DOI: 10.1038/s41572-021-00246-5. View

Olesen T, Sand F, Rasmussen C, Albieri V, Toft B, Norrild B . Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16 in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 20(1):145-158. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30682-X. View

Pang K, Yunis M, Haider A, Freeman A, Hadway P, Nigam R . Outcomes of Intraoperative Frozen Section Examination of Surgical Resection Margins of the Penis in Penile Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024; 22(5):102189. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102189. View

Moen C, Falkenthal T, Thorkelsen T, Hopland A, Rio O, Honore A . Penile Cancers Attributed to Human Papillomavirus Are Associated with Improved Survival for Node-positive Patients. Findings from a Norwegian Cohort Study Spanning 50 Years. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023; 7(4):778-785. DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.013. View

Skeppner E, Andersson S, Johansson J, Windahl T . Initial symptoms and delay in patients with penile carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012; 46(5):319-25. DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2012.677473. View

Lucky M, Murthy K, Rogers B, Jones S, Lau M, Sangar V . The treatment of penile carcinoma in situ (CIS) within a UK supra-regional network. BJU Int. 2014; 115(4):595-8. DOI: 10.1111/bju.12878. View

10.

Fankhauser C, Ayres B, Issa A, Albersen M, Watkin N, Muneer A . Practice Patterns Among Penile Cancer Surgeons Performing Dynamic Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Radical Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Men with Penile Cancer: A eUROGEN Survey. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021; 24:39-42. PMC: 8317807. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.12.009. View

11.

Yamaguchi T, Sugiyama Y, Tanaka T, Kimura T, Yumura Y, Nakano M . Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Penile Cancer 2021 by the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol. 2022; 29(8):780-792. DOI: 10.1111/iju.14924. View

12.

Ozambela Jr M, McCormick B, Rudzinski J, Pieretti A, Nogueras Gonzalez G, Meissner M . Robotic or open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection as staging procedures for clinically node negative high risk penile cancer. Urol Oncol. 2024; 42(4):120.e1-120.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.036. View

13.

Sotelo R, Sayegh A, Medina L, Perez L, La Riva A, Eppler M . Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus. BJS Open. 2024; 8(4). PMC: 11236483. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae056. View

14.

Yamamoto T, Matsuda N, Doi K, Oshima A, Yoshimatsu H, Todokoro T . The earliest finding of indocyanine green lymphography in asymptomatic limbs of lower extremity lymphedema patients secondary to cancer treatment: the modified dermal backflow stage and concept of subclinical lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128(4):314e-321e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268da8. View

15.

Adegboye O, Churchill J, Moorjani J, Johnson H, Capper S, Booker J . The Development and Feasibility of a Novel Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Eproms) Questionnaire in patients with penile cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024; 22(5):102168. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102168. View

16.

Sood A, Rudzinski J, Spiess P, Pettaway C . The Acute Complications After Surgery for Penile Carcinoma and Strategies for Their Management: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2022; 38(3):151285. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151285. View

17.

Parnham A, Albersen M, Sahdev V, Christodoulidou M, Nigam R, Malone P . Glansectomy and Split-thickness Skin Graft for Penile Cancer. Eur Urol. 2016; 73(2):284-289. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.09.048. View

18.

Spiess P, Hernandez M, Pettaway C . Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications. World J Urol. 2008; 27(2):205-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0324-6. View

19.

Brouwer O, Albersen M, Parnham A, Protzel C, Pettaway C, Ayres B . European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol. 2023; 83(6):548-560. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.027. View

20.

Nordanger I, Beisland C, Thorkelsen T, Honore A, Juliebo-Jones P, Bostad L . The Prognostic Value of Human Papillomavirus Status in Penile Cancer: Outcomes From a Norwegian Cohort Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024; 22(5):102127. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102127. View