Reasons and Resolutions for Gender Inequality Among Cardiologists and Cardiology Trainees

Overview

Journal Br J Cardiol

Specialty Cardiology & Vascular Diseases

Date 2024 Jun 24

PMID 38911690

Authors

Clara Portwood

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Women represented 29% of cardiology trainees and 16% of consultants in the UK in 2021. While the numbers of women in cardiology have increased over the last 20 years, these proportions remain among the lowest in comparison with other medical specialties. This essay aims to explore the contributing factors behind, and plans to reduce, gender disparity in cardiology. PubMed was searched using keywords such as 'gender', 'inequality', 'women', 'training' and 'cardiology'. Retrieved studies were screened for themes contributing towards, and strategies to overcome, gender inequality within cardiology. Reasons for gender inequality included poor perceptions of cardiology as a female-friendly specialty, experiences of gender-based discrimination, inflexible working hours, poor work- life balance, and lack of female role models. Recommended resolutions should target these themes; increase opportunities for flexible working hours, enforce a discrimination-free workplace culture, and encourage mentoring relationships between female senior and junior doctors. Improving the experience of the existing female workforce in cardiology will have a knock-on effect on the perceptions of trainees rotating through departments, in addition to initiatives promoting cardiology as a female-friendly specialty. In conclusion, promoting gender equality within cardiology remains an ongoing challenge. Nationwide efforts to increase retention and improve perceptions should target issues highlighted by the voices of women.

Citing Articles

Striking the Right Balance: Global Perspectives on Well-Being in Cardiology.

Verdoia M, Al-Bawardy R, de Medeiros Lopes M, Cader A, Dalakoti M, Merdad A JACC Adv. 2025; 4(3):101587.

PMID: 39914285 PMC: 11847296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101587.

Trends of Representation of Women in Professional Medical Societal Leadership in the United States and Europe.

Menezes S, Shenton A, Hays A, Taub C JACC Adv. 2025; 4(2):101522.

PMID: 39877669 PMC: 11773233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101522.

References

Sinclair H, Joshi A, Allen C, Joseph J, Sohaib S, Calver A . Women in Cardiology: The British Junior Cardiologists' Association identifies challenges. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40(3):227-231. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy828. View

Lau C, Johnson A, Nolder A, King D, Strub G . A novel algorithm to reduce bias and improve the quality and diversity of residency interviewees. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022; 7(5):1367-1375. PMC: 9575099. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.908. View

Zaman S, Shaw E, Ellenberger K, Rosa M, Leung M, Kwan V . Representation of Women in Internal Medicine Specialties in North America, the United Kingdom, and Australasia: Cardiology's Outlier Status and the Importance of Diversity. Am J Cardiol. 2022; 185:122-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.08.030. View

Douglas P, Rzeszut A, Merz C, Duvernoy C, Lewis S, Walsh M . Career Preferences and Perceptions of Cardiology Among US Internal Medicine Trainees: Factors Influencing Cardiology Career Choice. JAMA Cardiol. 2018; 3(8):682-691. PMC: 6143073. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1279. View

Sarma A, Nkonde-Price C, Gulati M, Duvernoy C, Lewis S, Wood M . Cardiovascular Medicine and Society: The Pregnant Cardiologist. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(1):92-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.09.978. View

Kurdi H, Morgan H, Williams C . Women not in cardiology: where are we going wrong? A survey of the perceptions and barriers to training. Br J Cardiol. 2022; 27(4):30. PMC: 9205256. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2020.030. View

Jaijee S, Kamau-Mitchell C, Mikhail G, Hendry C . Sexism experienced by consultant cardiologists in the United Kingdom. Heart. 2021; 107(11):895-901. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317837. View

Gonzaga A, Appiah-Pippim J, Onumah C, Yialamas M . A Framework for Inclusive Graduate Medical Education Recruitment Strategies: Meeting the ACGME Standard for a Diverse and Inclusive Workforce. Acad Med. 2019; 95(5):710-716. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003073. View

Borrelli N, Brida M, Cader A, Sabatino J, Czerwinska-Jelonkiewicz K, Shchendrygina A . Women leaders in Cardiology. Contemporary profile of the WHO European region. Eur Heart J Open. 2022; 1(1):oeab008. PMC: 9242062. DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeab008. View

10.

Yong C, Abnousi F, Rzeszut A, Douglas P, Harrington R, Mehran R . Sex Differences in the Pursuit of Interventional Cardiology as a Subspecialty Among Cardiovascular Fellows-in-Training. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(3):219-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.036. View

11.

Lau E, Hayes S, Volgman A, Lindley K, Pepine C, Wood M . Does Patient-Physician Gender Concordance Influence Patient Perceptions or Outcomes?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 77(8):1135-1138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.031. View

12.

Banks L, Randhawa V, Caterini J, Colella T, Dhanvantari S, McMurtry S . Sex, Gender, and Equity in Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, and Science in Canada Challenges, Successes, and Opportunities for Change. CJC Open. 2020; 2(6):522-529. PMC: 7711008. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.06.016. View

13.

Dettmer S, Wenzel A, Trenkwalder T, Tiefenbacher C, Regitz-Zagrosek V . Gender and career in cardiology-a cross-sectional study. Herz. 2021; 46(2):150-157. DOI: 10.1007/s00059-021-05027-0. View

14.

Raymundo-Martinez G, Alanis-Estrada G, Araiza-Garaygordobil D, Delgado-Cruz I, Gopar-Nieto R, Cabello-Lopez A . Gender differences in cardiology professionals: A Latin American Survey. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2022; 92(1):11-18. PMC: 8771022. DOI: 10.24875/ACM.200001591. View

15.

Witteman H, Hendricks M, Straus S, Tannenbaum C . Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency. Lancet. 2019; 393(10171):531-540. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32611-4. View

16.

Capranzano P, Kunadian V, Mauri J, Petronio A, Salvatella N, Appelman Y . Motivations for and barriers to choosing an interventional cardiology career path: results from the EAPCI Women Committee worldwide survey. EuroIntervention. 2015; 12(1):53-9. DOI: 10.4244/EIJY15M07_03. View

17.

Sardar P, Kundu A, Poppas A, Abbott J . Representation of Women in American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline Writing Committees. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72(4):464-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.011. View

18.

Wong B, Brennan A, James S, Brandon L, Ranganathan D, Dalton B . A report from the Irish women in cardiology survey, exploring Europe's largest gender gap in cardiology. Eur Heart J Open. 2022; 2(3):oeac033. PMC: 9242053. DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac033. View

19.

Biondi-Zoccai G, Cerrato E, Peruzzi M, DAscenzo F, De Falco E, Chimenti I . An International Survey on Taking Up a Career in Cardiovascular Research: Opportunities and Biases toward Would-Be Physician-Scientists. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0131900. PMC: 4506064. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131900. View

20.

Tsukada Y, Tokita M, Kato K, Kato Y, Miyauchi M, Ono I . Solutions for retention of female cardiologists: from the survey of gender differences in the work and life of cardiologists. Circ J. 2009; 73(11):2076-83. DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0206. View