» Articles » PMID: 31702694

A Framework for Inclusive Graduate Medical Education Recruitment Strategies: Meeting the ACGME Standard for a Diverse and Inclusive Workforce

Overview
Journal Acad Med
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2019 Nov 9
PMID 31702694
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To help address health care disparities and promote higher-quality, culturally sensitive care in the United States, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and other governing bodies propose cultivating a more diverse physician workforce. In addition, improved training and patient outcomes have been demonstrated for diverse care teams. However, prioritizing graduate medical education (GME) diversity and inclusion efforts can be challenging and unidimensional diversity initiatives typically result in failure.Little literature exists regarding actionable steps to promote diversity in GME. Building on existing literature and the authors' experiences at different institutions, the authors propose a 5-point inclusive recruitment framework for diversifying GME training programs. This article details each of the 5 steps of the framework, which begins with strong institutional support by setting diversity as a priority. Forming a cycle, the other 4 steps are seeking out candidates, implementing inclusive recruitment practices, investing in trainee success, and building the pipeline. Practical strategies for each step and recommendations for measurable outcomes for continued support for this work are provided. The proposed framework may better equip colleagues and leaders in academic medicine to prioritize and effectively promote diversity and inclusion in GME at their respective institutions.

Citing Articles

Trainee perspectives on diversity, equity, and inclusion: a group concept mapping study.

Szoko N, Radovic A, Wolford J, Matheo L, Torres O Med Educ Online. 2025; 30(1):2468936.

PMID: 40019034 PMC: 11873944. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2468936.


Community Racial and Ethnic Representation Among Physicians in US Internal Medicine Residency Programs.

Kim J, Lett E, Boscardin C, Hauer K, Chen I, Henderson M JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(1):e2457310.

PMID: 39883461 PMC: 11783195. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57310.


Exploring the perceptions of senior medical students on gender and pain: a qualitative study of the interplay between formal and hidden curricula.

Brown M, Costache C, Bull Parker S, Parekh R, Laughey W, Kumar S BMJ Open. 2024; 14(8):e080420.

PMID: 39214658 PMC: 11404253. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080420.


Reasons and resolutions for gender inequality among cardiologists and cardiology trainees.

Portwood C Br J Cardiol. 2024; 30(2):13.

PMID: 38911690 PMC: 11189160. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2023.013.


Using Disadvantaged Status in the Residency Ranking Process May Result in Higher Ranked and More Matched Underrepresented in Medicine Applicants.

Sofka S, Reece J, Sizemore J, Davisson L, Lerfald N J Grad Med Educ. 2024; 16(3):343-344.

PMID: 38882417 PMC: 11173018. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00727.1.