» Articles » PMID: 33305212

Sex, Gender, and Equity in Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, and Science in Canada Challenges, Successes, and Opportunities for Change

Abstract

Background: A previous review of sex, gender, and equity within cardiovascular (CV) medicine, surgery, and science in Canada has revealed parity during medical and graduate school training. The purpose of this study was to explore sex and gendered experiences within the Canadian CV landscape, and their impact on career training and progression.

Methods: An environmental scan was conducted of the Canadian CV landscape, which included an equity survey using Qualtrics software.

Results: The environmental scan revealed that women remain underrepresented within CV training programs as trainees (12%-30%), program directors (33%), in leadership roles at the divisional level (21%), and in other professional or career-related activities (< 30%). Our analysis also showed improvements of career engagement at these levels of women at over time. The thematic analysis of the equity survey responses (n = 71 respondents; 83% female; 9.7% response rate among female Canadian Cardiovascular Society members) identified the following themes reported within the socio-ecological framework: desire to report inequities vs staying the course (individual level); desire for social support and mentorship and challenges of dual responsibilities (interpersonal level); concerns over exclusionary cliques and desire for respect and opportunity (organizational level); and increasing awareness and actions to overcome institutional barriers and accountability (societal level).

Conclusions: Although women face challenges and remain underrepresented in CV medicine, surgery, and science, this study highlights potential opportunities for improving access of female medical, surgical, and research trainees and professionals to specialized cardiovascular training, career advancement, leadership, and research.

Citing Articles

Women in cardiac surgery: a global workforce analysis.

Izumi A, Lee G, Gomes Z, Ouzounian M, Adinku P, Montes L Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 67(1).

PMID: 39693123 PMC: 11681938. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae463.


Reasons and resolutions for gender inequality among cardiologists and cardiology trainees.

Portwood C Br J Cardiol. 2024; 30(2):13.

PMID: 38911690 PMC: 11189160. DOI: 10.5837/bjc.2023.013.


The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - Chapter 8: Knowledge Gaps and Status of Existing Research Programs in Canada.

Clavel M, Van Spall H, Mantella L, Foulds H, Randhawa V, Parry M CJC Open. 2024; 6(2Part B):220-257.

PMID: 38487042 PMC: 10935691. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.11.013.


Experiences and Impacts of Harassment and Discrimination Among Women in Cardiac Medicine and Surgery: A Single-Center Qualitative Study.

Ruzycki S, McFadden C, Jenkins J, Kuriachan V, Keir M CJC Open. 2022; 4(8):676-684.

PMID: 36035737 PMC: 9402956. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.04.003.


Gender Differences in International Cardiology Guideline Authorship: A Comparison of the US, Canadian, and European Cardiology Guidelines From 2006 to 2020.

Rai D, Kumar A, Waheed S, Pandey R, Guerriero M, Kapoor A J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(5):e024249.

PMID: 35189693 PMC: 9075085. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024249.


References
1.
Khan M, Mahmood S, Khan S, Fatima K, Khosa F, Sharma G . Women Training in Cardiology and Its Subspecialties in the United States: A Decade of Little Progress in Representation. Circulation. 2020; 141(7):609-611. PMC: 7457430. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044693. View

2.
Wallis C, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam R, Detsky A, Satkunasivam R . Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2017; 359:j4366. PMC: 6284261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4366. View

3.
Lewiss R, Silver J, Bernstein C, Mills A, Overholser B, Spector N . Is Academic Medicine Making Mid-Career Women Physicians Invisible?. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019; 29(2):187-192. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7732. View

4.
Burgess S, Shaw E, Ellenberger K, Segan L, Castles A, Biswas S . Gender equity within medical specialties of Australia and New Zealand: cardiology's outlier status. Intern Med J. 2019; 50(4):412-419. DOI: 10.1111/imj.14406. View

5.
Diderichsen S, Johansson E, Verdonk P, Lagro-Janssen T, Hamberg K . Few gender differences in specialty preferences and motivational factors: a cross-sectional Swedish study on last-year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13:39. PMC: 3599519. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-39. View