» Articles » PMID: 38891650

Factors Affecting Poultry Producers' Attitudes Towards Biosecurity

Abstract

Poultry producers' attitudes towards biosecurity practices were assessed by using the ADKAR (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement) behavioral change model. Conventional poultry producers ( = 155) from different production types including broilers ( = 35), layers ( = 22), breeders ( = 24), turkeys ( = 19), ducks ( = 23), free-range broilers ( = 11), free-range layers ( = 11), and hatcheries ( = 10) from seven European countries were scored for each ADKAR element (1 = total absence to 5 = perfect fulfilment). Each country performed selected interventions (e.g., coaching, participatory meetings, etc.) to improve biosecurity compliance. After the interventions, significant change was observed in three of the four attitude elements. The overall mean scores (x¯ ± SD) obtained during the initial assessment ( = 130) were 4.2 ± 0.6 for Awareness, 4.1 ± 0.7 for Desire, 3.8 ± 0.8 for Knowledge, and 4.0 ± 0.7 for Ability, whereas after intervention, the scores were A = 4.3 ± 0.6, D = 4.2 ± 0.7, K = 4.1 ± 0.7, and Ab = 4.1 ± 0.7. The Reinforcement component was only evaluated after the change and obtained a score of 3.7 ± 0.7 on average. Identifying the elements influencing poultry producers and their behavior related to farm management decisions was useful in guiding our educational interventions to effectively change their behavior.

Citing Articles

Flexible assessment of biosecurity in small- and medium scale poultry farms in low and middle income countries.

Nielsen S, Kemunto N, Muloi D, Bojesen A, Knight-Jones T, Ayebare D Acta Vet Scand. 2025; 67(1):9.

PMID: 39920832 PMC: 11806742. DOI: 10.1186/s13028-025-00796-8.


Assessing the Impact of On-Farm Biosecurity Coaching on Farmer Perception and Farm Biosecurity Status in Belgian Poultry Production.

Amalraj A, Van Meirhaeghe H, Chantziaras I, Dewulf J Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272283 PMC: 11394560. DOI: 10.3390/ani14172498.


Supporting Measures to Improve Biosecurity within Italian Poultry Production.

Tilli G, Laconi A, Galuppo F, Grilli G, Zbikowski A, Amalraj A Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(12).

PMID: 38929353 PMC: 11201041. DOI: 10.3390/ani14121734.

References
1.
Fasina F, Ali A, Yilma J, Thieme O, Ankers P . The cost-benefit of biosecurity measures on infectious diseases in the Egyptian household poultry. Prev Vet Med. 2011; 103(2-3):178-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.09.016. View

2.
Paul M, Wongnarkpet S, Gasqui P, Poolkhet C, Thongratsakul S, Ducrot C . Risk factors for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 infection in backyard chicken farms, Thailand. Acta Trop. 2011; 118(3):209-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.03.009. View

3.
Hall J, Wapenaar W . Opinions and practices of veterinarians and dairy farmers towards herd health management in the UK. Vet Rec. 2012; 170(17):441. DOI: 10.1136/vr.100318. View

4.
Duvauchelle A, Huneau-Salaun A, Balaine L, Rose N, Michel V . Risk factors for the introduction of avian influenza virus in breeder duck flocks during the first 24 weeks of laying. Avian Pathol. 2013; 42(5):447-56. DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2013.823145. View

5.
Ellis-Iversen J, Cook A, Watson E, Nielen M, Larkin L, Wooldridge M . Perceptions, circumstances and motivators that influence implementation of zoonotic control programs on cattle farms. Prev Vet Med. 2009; 93(4):276-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.005. View