» Articles » PMID: 39272283

Assessing the Impact of On-Farm Biosecurity Coaching on Farmer Perception and Farm Biosecurity Status in Belgian Poultry Production

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2024 Sep 14
PMID 39272283
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Veterinary coaching was tested to assess its efficacy in promoting adherence to biosecurity procedures. Poultry farmers ( = 13) in Belgium were profiled using ADKAR, coached and audited prior to and 6 months after coaching. The ADKAR (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement) profiling technique identified 5/13 participating farmers with relatively low scores (≤3) for one or more elements that block change (biosecurity compliance in this case). Education was the only demographic variable that influenced knowledge scores. Through the Biocheck.Ugent methodology, farm biosecurity was assessed and benchmarked to allow for tailored guidance. The farmer, farm veterinarian, and coach defined a farm-specific action plan that covered infrastructure, site access, staff/visitors, purchase policies, transport and depopulation, feed and water supplies, flock management, cleaning and disinfection between flocks, and measures between houses. From a total of 49 proposed actions, 36 were adopted. Purchasing policy had the highest (100%) and cleaning and disinfection had the lowest compliance (38%). Time, cost, and feasibility (e.g., inadequate farm layout) were the main reasons cited for not implementing action points. Overall, biosecurity improved significantly ( = 0.002) from 67.1 ± 5.7% to 70.3 ± 5.7% (mean ± Std. dev). The study, hence, presents convincing proof of how coaching can lead to new solutions not previously considered.

References
1.
Olsen S, Laosiritaworn Y, Pattanasin S, Prapasiri P, Dowell S . Poultry-handling practices during avian influenza outbreak, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005; 11(10):1601-3. PMC: 3366731. DOI: 10.3201/eid1110.041267. View

2.
Gosling R, Martelli F, Wintrip A, Sayers A, Wheeler K, Davies R . Assessment of producers' response to Salmonella biosecurity issues and uptake of advice on laying hen farms in England and Wales. Br Poult Sci. 2014; 55(5):559-68. DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2014.949620. View

3.
Raasch S, Collineau L, Postma M, Backhans A, Sjolund M, Belloc C . Effectiveness of alternative measures to reduce antimicrobial usage in pig production in four European countries. Porcine Health Manag. 2020; 6:6. PMC: 7050127. DOI: 10.1186/s40813-020-0145-6. View

4.
Garforth C . Livestock keepers' reasons for doing and not doing things which governments, vets and scientists would like them to do. Zoonoses Public Health. 2015; 62 Suppl 1:29-38. DOI: 10.1111/zph.12189. View

5.
Marcdante K, Simpson D . Choosing When to Advise, Coach, or Mentor. J Grad Med Educ. 2018; 10(2):227-228. PMC: 5901806. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00111.1. View