» Articles » PMID: 38831247

Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38831247
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Proactive tobacco treatment programs are an evidence-based strategy to recruit patients who smoke to make supported quit attempts. However, such programs are rarely implemented. We performed a qualitative assessment of clinicians to inform the creation of a proactive outreach program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke.

Methods: Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we conducted semi-structured interviews to assess clinician views of proactive outreach, including barriers, program structure, and the use of technology. Clinicians included primary and specialty care physicians, nurses and advanced practice providers, pharmacists, respiratory therapists, a psychologist, and relevant members of leadership. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using directed content analysis.

Results: Clinicians in all roles identified that proactive outreach could be an effective use of resources to help patients with COPD who smoke quit with several advantages over the current state. Clinicians disagreed on the priority population (e.g., younger patients, sicker patients), and to some extent on whether proactive outreach is a clinical priority. Though they supported that technology could be part of the outreach program, most advocated for multiple avenues (phone calls, drop-in clinic, texting), as these patients were perceived to be low technology utilizers. The primary implementation barriers were competing priorities and cost, as well as unclear billing and staffing models.

Conclusions: Clinicians support proactive outreach for patients with COPD, but the optimal way to structure, staff, and fund such programs remains unclear. Health systems should leverage implementation strategies to speed uptake of these potentially life-saving programs.

References
1.
Nahhas G, Wilson D, Talbot V, Cartmell K, Warren G, Toll B . Feasibility of Implementing a Hospital-Based "Opt-Out" Tobacco-Cessation Service. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; 19(8):937-943. PMC: 10615132. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw312. View

2.
Jimenez-Ruiz C, Andreas S, Lewis K, Tonnesen P, van Schayck C, Hajek P . Statement on smoking cessation in COPD and other pulmonary diseases and in smokers with comorbidities who find it difficult to quit. Eur Respir J. 2015; 46(1):61-79. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00092614. View

3.
van Eerd E, van Rossem C, Spigt M, Wesseling G, van Schayck O, Kotz D . Do we need tailored smoking cessation interventions for smokers with COPD? A comparative study of smokers with and without COPD regarding factors associated with tobacco smoking. Respiration. 2015; 90(3):211-9. DOI: 10.1159/000398816. View

3.
Burris J, Borger T, Baker T, Bernstein S, Ostroff J, Rigotti N . Proposing a Model of Proactive Outreach to Advance Clinical Research and Care Delivery for Patients Who Use Tobacco. J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 37(10):2548-2552. PMC: 9360368. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07553-x. View

4.
Damschroder L, Aron D, Keith R, Kirsh S, Alexander J, Lowery J . Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:50. PMC: 2736161. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50. View