Offering Population-based Tobacco Treatment in a Healthcare Setting: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The healthcare system is a key channel for delivering treatment to tobacco users. Brief clinic-based interventions are effective but not reliably offered. Population management strategies might improve tobacco treatment delivery in a healthcare system.
Purpose: To test the effectiveness of supplementing clinic-based care with a population-based direct-to-smoker (DTS) outreach offering easily accessible free tobacco treatment.
Design: Randomized controlled trial, conducted in 2009-2010, comparing usual clinical care to usual care plus DTS outreach.
Setting/participants: A total of 590 smokers registered for primary care at a community health center in Revere MA.
Interventions: Three monthly letters offering a free telephone consultation with a tobacco coordinator who provided free treatment including up to 8 weeks of nicotine patches (NRT) and proactive referral to the state quitline for multisession counseling.
Main Outcome Measures: Use of any tobacco treatment (primary outcome) and tobacco abstinence at the 3-month follow-up; cost per quit.
Results: Of 413 eligible smokers, 43 (10.4%) in the DTS group accepted the treatment offer; 42 (98%) requested NRT and 30 (70%) requested counseling. In intention-to-treat analyses adjusted by logistic regression for age, gender, race, insurance, diabetes, and coronary heart disease, a higher proportion of the DTS group, compared to controls, had used NRT (11.6% vs 3.9%, OR=3.47; 95% CI=1.52, 7.92) or any tobacco treatment (14.5% vs 7.3%, OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.04, 3.65) and reported being tobacco abstinent for the past 7 days (5.3% vs 1.1%, OR=5.35, 95% CI=1.23, 22.32) and past 30 days (4.1% vs 0.6%, OR=8.25, 95% CI=1.08, 63.01). The intervention did not increase smokers' use of counseling (1.7% vs 1.1%) or non-NRT medication (3.6% vs 3.9%). Estimated incremental cost per quit was $464.
Conclusions: A population-based outreach offering free tobacco treatment to smokers in a health center was a feasible, cost-effective way to increase the reach of treatment (primarily NRT) and to increase short-term quit rates.
Trial Registration: This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.govNCT01321944.
Park E, Haas J, Rigotti N, Neil J, Marotta C, Wint A JAMA Intern Med. 2025; .
PMID: 40029643 PMC: 11877408. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.8399.
MiQuit: A Study Protocol to Link Low-Income Smokers to a State Tobacco Quitline.
Matthews A, Steffen A, Burke L, Vilona B, Donenberg G Ethn Dis. 2024; DECIPHeR(Spec Issue):44-51.
PMID: 38846727 PMC: 11895545. DOI: 10.18865/ed.DECIPHeR.44.
Clinician Views of Proactive Tobacco Treatment Programs: A Qualitative Evaluation.
Melzer A, Campbell M, Hagedorn H, Fu S J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(11):2079-2086.
PMID: 38831247 PMC: 11306907. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08834-3.
Wu Y, Cheung Y, Lee J, Wong C, Ho S, Li W J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e44973.
PMID: 38739429 PMC: 11130779. DOI: 10.2196/44973.
Valencia C, Dove M, Cummins S, Kirby C, Zhu S, Giboney P Nicotine Tob Res. 2022; 25(1):43-49.
PMID: 36103393 PMC: 9717369. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac156.