» Articles » PMID: 25889199

A Refined Compilation of Implementation Strategies: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Project

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2015 Apr 19
PMID 25889199
Citations 1832
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Identifying, developing, and testing implementation strategies are important goals of implementation science. However, these efforts have been complicated by the use of inconsistent language and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies in the literature. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aimed to refine a published compilation of implementation strategy terms and definitions by systematically gathering input from a wide range of stakeholders with expertise in implementation science and clinical practice.

Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit a panel of experts in implementation and clinical practice who engaged in three rounds of a modified Delphi process to generate consensus on implementation strategies and definitions. The first and second rounds involved Web-based surveys soliciting comments on implementation strategy terms and definitions. After each round, iterative refinements were made based upon participant feedback. The third round involved a live polling and consensus process via a Web-based platform and conference call.

Results: Participants identified substantial concerns with 31% of the terms and/or definitions and suggested five additional strategies. Seventy-five percent of definitions from the originally published compilation of strategies were retained after voting. Ultimately, the expert panel reached consensus on a final compilation of 73 implementation strategies.

Conclusions: This research advances the field by improving the conceptual clarity, relevance, and comprehensiveness of implementation strategies that can be used in isolation or combination in implementation research and practice. Future phases of ERIC will focus on developing conceptually distinct categories of strategies as well as ratings for each strategy's importance and feasibility. Next, the expert panel will recommend multifaceted strategies for hypothetical yet real-world scenarios that vary by sites' endorsement of evidence-based programs and practices and the strength of contextual supports that surround the effort.

Citing Articles

Implementation Strategies for Digital HIV Prevention and Care Interventions for Youth: A Scoping Review.

Brasileiro J, Queiroz A, Hightow-Weidman L, Muessig K Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2025; 22(1):23.

PMID: 40080278 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-025-00732-5.


Translating Evidence for a Mediterranean-Style Dietary Pattern into Routine Care for Coronary Heart Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: Implementation and Evaluation in a Targeted Public Health Service in Australia.

Mayr H, Hayes L, Wang W, Murray E, Kelly J, Palmer M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5).

PMID: 40077068 PMC: 11898626. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13050506.


Co-Design and Evaluation Protocol for the RECOVER Model of Care After Childhood Cancer Treatment.

Bradford N, Cashion C, Sharwood E, Rumble S, Condon P, Cossio D Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(5).

PMID: 40077016 PMC: 11899481. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13050454.


Supporting partnerships in knowledge mobilization: what existing implementation strategies can tell us.

MacKenzie N, Chambers C, Birnie K, Jordan I, Cassidy C Res Involv Engagem. 2025; 11(1):23.

PMID: 40075498 PMC: 11900096. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-025-00688-1.


Transdiagnostic internet cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depressive symptoms in postnatal women: protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Roberge P, Vasiliadis H, Chapdelaine A, Battista M, Beaulieu M, Chomienne M BMC Psychiatry. 2025; 25(1):237.

PMID: 40075340 PMC: 11905520. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-025-06636-3.


References
1.
Colquhoun H, Leeman J, Michie S, Lokker C, Bragge P, Hempel S . Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implement Sci. 2014; 9:51. PMC: 4021969. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-51. View

2.
Mazza D, Bairstow P, Buchan H, Chakraborty S, Van Hecke O, Grech C . Refining a taxonomy for guideline implementation: results of an exercise in abstract classification. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:32. PMC: 3606141. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-32. View

3.
Albrecht L, Archibald M, Arseneau D, Scott S . Development of a checklist to assess the quality of reporting of knowledge translation interventions using the Workgroup for Intervention Development and Evaluation Research (WIDER) recommendations. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:52. PMC: 3661354. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-52. View

4.
Davidoff F, Batalden P . Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005; 14(5):319-25. PMC: 1744070. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014787. View

5.
Proctor E, Powell B, McMillen J . Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013; 8:139. PMC: 3882890. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-139. View