Super Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction for Coronary CT Angiography: A Structured Phantom Study

Overview

Journal Eur J Radiol Open

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Jun 3

PMID 38828096

Authors

Toru Higaki

Fuminari Tatsugami

Mickael Ohana

Yuko Nakamura

Ikuo Kawashita

Kazuo Awai

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction: SR-DLR is a newly developed and clinically available deep-learning-based image reconstruction method that can improve the spatial resolution of CT images. The image quality of the output from non-linear image reconstructions, such as DLR, is known to vary depending on the structure of the object being scanned, and a simple phantom cannot explicitly evaluate the clinical performance of SR-DLR. This study aims to accurately investigate the quality of the images reconstructed by SR-DLR by utilizing a structured phantom that simulates the human anatomy in coronary CT angiography.

Methods: The structural phantom had ribs and vertebrae made of plaster, a left ventricle filled with dilute contrast medium, a coronary artery with simulated stenosis, and an implanted stent graft. By scanning the structured phantom, we evaluated noise and spatial resolution on the images reconstructed with SR-DLR and conventional reconstructions.

Results: The spatial resolution of SR-DLR was higher than conventional reconstructions; the 10 % modulation transfer function of hybrid IR (HIR), DLR, and SR-DLR were 0.792-, 0.976-, and 1.379 cycle/mm, respectively. At the same time, image noise was lowest (HIR: 21.1-, DLR: 19.0-, and SR-DLR: 13.1 HU). SR-DLR could accurately assess coronary artery stenosis and the lumen of the implanted stent graft.

Conclusions: SR-DLR can obtain CT images with high spatial resolution and lower noise without special CT equipments, and will help diagnose coronary artery disease in CCTA and other CT examinations that require high spatial resolution.

Citing Articles

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction for improved quality of myocardial CT late enhancement.

Takafuji M, Kitagawa K, Mizutani S, Hamaguchi A, Kisou R, Sasaki K Jpn J Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40072715 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-025-01760-2.

Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures.

Nakamoto A, Onishi H, Ota T, Honda T, Tsuboyama T, Fukui H Jpn J Radiol. 2024; 43(3):445-454.

PMID: 39538066 PMC: 11868232. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-024-01685-2.

References

Sandfort V, Persson M, Pourmorteza A, Noel P, Fleischmann D, Willemink M . Spectral photon-counting CT in cardiovascular imaging. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020; 15(3):218-225. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2020.12.005. View

Motoyama S, Ito H, Sarai M, Nagahara Y, Miyajima K, Matsumoto R . Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography Angiography for Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis. Circ J. 2018; 82(7):1844-1851. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1281. View

Nagayama Y, Emoto T, Hayashi H, Kidoh M, Oda S, Nakaura T . Coronary Stent Evaluation by CTA: Image Quality Comparison Between Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction and Other Reconstruction Algorithms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023; 221(5):599-610. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.23.29506. View

Budoff M, Dowe D, Jollis J, Gitter M, Sutherland J, Halamert E . Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52(21):1724-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.031. View

Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Kawashita I, Fukumoto W, Nakamura Y, Matsuura M . Improvement of Spatial Resolution on Coronary CT Angiography by Using Super-Resolution Deep Learning Reconstruction. Acad Radiol. 2023; 30(11):2497-2504. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.044. View

Takagi H, Tanaka R, Nagata K, Ninomiya R, Arakita K, Schuijf J . Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography with ultra-high-resolution CT: Comparison with invasive coronary angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2018; 101:30-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.030. View

Rajagopal J, Farhadi F, Richards T, Nikpanah M, Sahbaee P, Shanbhag S . Evaluation of Coronary Plaques and Stents with Conventional and Photon-counting CT: Benefits of High-Resolution Photon-counting CT. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021; 3(5):e210102. PMC: 8581588. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2021210102. View

Higaki T, Nakamura Y, Tatsugami F, Nakaura T, Awai K . Improvement of image quality at CT and MRI using deep learning. Jpn J Radiol. 2018; 37(1):73-80. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-018-0796-2. View

Nagayama Y, Emoto T, Kato Y, Kidoh M, Oda S, Sakabe D . Improving image quality with super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction in coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(12):8488-8500. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09888-3. View

10.

Mileto A, Guimaraes L, McCollough C, Fletcher J, Yu L . State of the Art in Abdominal CT: The Limits of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms. Radiology. 2019; 293(3):491-503. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019191422. View

11.

Nakamura Y, Higaki T, Tatsugami F, Honda Y, Narita K, Akagi M . Possibility of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging Focusing Improvement of Computed Tomography Image Quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019; 44(2):161-167. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000928. View

12.

Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C, Wintersperger B, Leber A, Johnson T . Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(1):111-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1697. View

13.

Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, Samei E . Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys. 2020; 47(9):3961-3971. DOI: 10.1002/mp.14319. View

14.

Sato H, Fujimoto S, Tomizawa N, Inage H, Yokota T, Kudo H . Impact of a Deep Learning-based Super-resolution Image Reconstruction Technique on High-contrast Computed Tomography: A Phantom Study. Acad Radiol. 2023; 30(11):2657-2665. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.040. View

15.

Petritsch B, Petri N, Weng A, Petersilka M, Allmendinger T, Bley T . Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Coronary Stent Imaging: In Vitro Evaluation of 28 Coronary Stents. Invest Radiol. 2021; 56(10):653-660. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000787. View

16.

Fukumoto W, Nagaoka M, Higaki T, Tatsugami F, Nakamura Y, Oostveen L . Measurement of coronary artery calcium volume using ultra-high-resolution computed tomography: A preliminary phantom and cadaver study. Eur J Radiol Open. 2020; 7:100253. PMC: 7490539. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100253. View

17.

Raff G, Gallagher M, ONeill W, Goldstein J . Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(3):552-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.056. View

18.

Richard S, Husarik D, Yadava G, Murphy S, Samei E . Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys. 2012; 39(7):4115-22. DOI: 10.1118/1.4725171. View

19.

Samei E, Bakalyar D, Boedeker K, Brady S, Fan J, Leng S . Performance evaluation of computed tomography systems: Summary of AAPM Task Group 233. Med Phys. 2019; 46(11):e735-e756. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13763. View