» Articles » PMID: 38820571

Disentangling the Effects of Metabolic Cost and Accuracy on Movement Speed

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 May 31
PMID 38820571
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

On any given day, we make countless reaching movements to objects around us. While such ubiquity may suggest uniformity, each movement's speed is unique-why is this? Reach speed is known to be influenced by accuracy; we slow down to sustain high accuracy. However, in other forms of movement like walking or running, metabolic cost is often the primary determinant of movement speed. Here we bridge this gap and ask: how do metabolic cost and accuracy interact to determine speed of reaching movements? First, we systematically measure the effect of increasing mass on the metabolic cost of reaching across a range of movement speeds. Next, in a sequence of three experiments, we examine how added mass affects preferred reaching speed across changing accuracy requirements. We find that, while added mass consistently increases metabolic cost thereby leading to slower metabolically optimal movement speeds, self-selected reach speeds are slower than those predicted by an optimization of metabolic cost alone. We then demonstrate how a single model that considers both accuracy and metabolic costs can explain preferred movement speeds. Together, our findings provide a unifying framework to illuminate the combined effects of metabolic cost and accuracy on movement speed and highlight the integral role metabolic cost plays in determining reach speed.

Citing Articles

Physical effort precrastination determines preference in an isometric task.

Healy C, Ahmed A J Neurophysiol. 2024; 132(5):1395-1411.

PMID: 39319787 PMC: 11573280. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00040.2024.


Slowing of Movements in Healthy Aging as a Rational Economic Response to an Elevated Effort Landscape.

Summerside E, Courter R, Shadmehr R, Ahmed A J Neurosci. 2024; 44(15).

PMID: 38408872 PMC: 11007314. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1596-23.2024.


Effects of reward and effort history on decision making and movement vigor during foraging.

Sukumar S, Shadmehr R, Ahmed A J Neurophysiol. 2023; 131(4):638-651.

PMID: 38056423 PMC: 11305639. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00092.2023.

References
1.
Yoon T, Jaleel A, Ahmed A, Shadmehr R . Saccade vigor and the subjective economic value of visual stimuli. J Neurophysiol. 2020; 123(6):2161-2172. PMC: 7311721. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00700.2019. View

2.
Rosenbaum D . Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980; 109(4):444-74. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.444. View

3.
Dean M, Wu S, Maloney L . Trading off speed and accuracy in rapid, goal-directed movements. J Vis. 2008; 7(5):10.1-12. DOI: 10.1167/7.5.10. View

4.
Goble J, Zhang Y, Shimansky Y, Sharma S, Dounskaia N . Directional biases reveal utilization of arm's biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior. J Neurophysiol. 2007; 98(3):1240-52. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00582.2007. View

5.
Niv Y, Daw N, Joel D, Dayan P . Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 191(3):507-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0502-4. View