Independence of Movement Preparation and Movement Initiation
Overview
Affiliations
Initiating a movement in response to a visual stimulus takes significantly longer than might be expected on the basis of neural transmission delays, but it is unclear why. In a visually guided reaching task, we forced human participants to move at lower-than-normal reaction times to test whether normal reaction times are strictly necessary for accurate movement. We found that participants were, in fact, capable of moving accurately ∼80 ms earlier than their reaction times would suggest. Reaction times thus include a seemingly unnecessary delay that accounts for approximately one-third of their duration. Close examination of participants' behavior in conventional reaction-time conditions revealed that they generated occasional, spontaneous errors in trials in which their reaction time was unusually short. The pattern of these errors could be well accounted for by a simple model in which the timing of movement initiation is independent of the timing of movement preparation. This independence provides an explanation for why reaction times are usually so sluggish: delaying the mean time of movement initiation relative to preparation reduces the risk that a movement will be initiated before it has been appropriately prepared. Our results suggest that preparation and initiation of movement are mechanistically independent and may have a distinct neural basis. The results also demonstrate that, even in strongly stimulus-driven tasks, presentation of a stimulus does not directly trigger a movement. Rather, the stimulus appears to trigger an internal decision whether to make a movement, reflecting a volitional rather than reactive mode of control.
Feedback and feedforward control are differentially delayed in cerebellar ataxia.
Cao D, Wilkinson M, Bastian A, Cowan N bioRxiv. 2025; .
PMID: 39990312 PMC: 11844357. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.09.637327.
The forced-response method: A new chronometric approach to measure conflict processing.
Lee T, Sellers J, Jonides J, Zhang H Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):15.
PMID: 39668280 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02516-y.
Motor practice related changes in the sensorimotor cortices of youth with cerebral palsy.
Kurz M, Taylor B, Heinrichs-Graham E, Spooner R, Baker S, Wilson T Brain Commun. 2024; 6(5):fcae332.
PMID: 39391334 PMC: 11465084. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae332.
The temporal dynamics of visual attention.
Zhang H, Sellers J, Lee T, Jonides J J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024; 154(2):435-456.
PMID: 39361368 PMC: 11790386. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001661.
When and why does motor preparation arise in recurrent neural network models of motor control?.
Schimel M, Kao T, Hennequin G Elife. 2024; 12.
PMID: 39316044 PMC: 11421851. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89131.