The Role of Long-term Target and Masker Talker Familiarity in Children's Speech-in-speech Recognition

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2024 May 24

PMID 38784624

Authors

Mary M Flaherty

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This study investigated the influence of long-term talker familiarity on speech-in-speech recognition in school-age children, with a specific emphasis on the role of familiarity with the mother's voice as either the target or masker speech.

Design: Open-set sentence recognition was measured adaptively in a two-talker masker. Target and masker sentences were recorded by the adult mothers of the child participants. Each child heard sentences spoken by three adult female voices during testing; their own mother's voice (familiar voice) and two unfamiliar adult female voices.

Study Sample: Twenty-four school age children (8-13 years) with normal hearing.

Results: When the target speech was spoken by a familiar talker (the mother), speech recognition was significantly better compared to when the target was unfamiliar. When the masker was spoken by the familiar talker, there was no difference in performance relative to the unfamiliar masker condition. Across all conditions, younger children required a more favorable signal-to-noise ratio than older children.

Conclusion: Implicit long-term familiarity with a talker consistently improves children's speech-in-speech recognition across the age range tested, specifically when the target talker is familiar. However, performance remains unaffected by masker talker familiarity. Additionally, while target familiarity is advantageous, it does not entirely eliminate children's increased susceptibility to competing speech.

References

Kreitewolf J, Mathias S, von Kriegstein K . Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1584. PMC: 5603660. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01584. View

Domingo Y, Holmes E, Johnsrude I . The benefit to speech intelligibility of hearing a familiar voice. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019; 26(2):236-247. DOI: 10.1037/xap0000247. View

Theodore R, Myers E, Lomibao J . Talker-specific influences on phonetic category structure. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015; 138(2):1068-78. DOI: 10.1121/1.4927489. View

Flaherty M, Buss E, Leibold L . Independent and Combined Effects of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Differences for School-Age Children's Sentence Recognition in a Two-Talker Masker. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 64(1):206-217. PMC: 8610228. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00327. View

Johnsrude I, Mackey A, Hakyemez H, Alexander E, Trang H, Carlyon R . Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(10):1995-2004. DOI: 10.1177/0956797613482467. View

Nygaard L, Sommers M, Pisoni D . SPEECH PERCEPTION AS A TALKER-CONTINGENT PROCESS. Psychol Sci. 2011; 5(1):42-46. PMC: 3081685. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.x. View

Leibold L, Buss E . Children's identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013; 56(4):1144-55. PMC: 3981452. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0011). View

Coch D, Sanders L, Neville H . An event-related potential study of selective auditory attention in children and adults. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(4):605-22. DOI: 10.1162/0898929053467631. View

Bench J, Kowal A, Bamford J . The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. Br J Audiol. 1979; 13(3):108-12. DOI: 10.3109/03005367909078884. View

10.

Buss E, Leibold L, Porter H, Grose J . Speech recognition in one- and two-talker maskers in school-age children and adults: Development of perceptual masking and glimpsing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141(4):2650. PMC: 5391283. DOI: 10.1121/1.4979936. View

11.

Corbin N, Bonino A, Buss E, Leibold L . Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers. Ear Hear. 2015; 37(1):55-63. PMC: 4684436. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000201. View

12.

Calandruccio L, Leibold L, Buss E . Linguistic Masking Release in School-Age Children and Adults. Am J Audiol. 2016; 25(1):34-40. PMC: 4832874. DOI: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0053. View

13.

Levi S, Harel D, Schwartz R . Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62(5):1427-1436. PMC: 6808318. DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0160. View

14.

Karns C, Isbell E, Giuliano R, Neville H . Auditory attention in childhood and adolescence: An event-related potential study of spatial selective attention to one of two simultaneous stories. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 13:53-67. PMC: 4470421. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.03.001. View

15.

Garcia Lecumberri M, Cooke M . Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119(4):2445-54. DOI: 10.1121/1.2180210. View

16.

Buss E, Hodge S, Calandruccio L, Leibold L, Grose J . Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type. Ear Hear. 2019; 40(5):1117-1126. PMC: 6599542. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000692. View

17.

Clarke C, Garrett M . Rapid adaptation to foreign-accented English. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 116(6):3647-58. DOI: 10.1121/1.1815131. View

18.

Barker B, Newman R . Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition. 2004; 94(2):B45-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.001. View

19.

Flaherty M, Price R, Murgia S, Manukian E . Can Playing a Game Improve Children's Speech Recognition? A Preliminary Study of Implicit Talker Familiarity Effects. Am J Audiol. 2023; :1-16. DOI: 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00156. View

20.

Levi S . Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children. J Child Lang. 2014; 42(4):843-72. PMC: 4344430. DOI: 10.1017/S0305000914000506. View