Children's Identification of Consonants in a Speech-shaped Noise or a Two-talker Masker

Overview

Journal J Speech Lang Hear Res

Date 2013 Jun 21

PMID 23785181

Citations 41

Authors

Lori J Leibold

Emily Buss

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate child-adult differences for consonant identification in a noise or a 2-talker masker. Error patterns were compared across age and masker type to test the hypothesis that errors with the noise masker reflect limitations in the peripheral encoding of speech, whereas errors with the 2-talker masker reflect target-masker confusions within the central auditory system.

Method: A repeated-measures design compared the performance of children (5-13 years) and adults in continuous speech-shaped noise or a 2-talker masker. Consonants were identified from a closed set of 12 using a picture-pointing response.

Results: In speech-shaped noise, children under age 10 years performed more poorly than adults, but performance was adultlike for 11- to 13-year-olds. In the 2-talker masker, significant child-adult differences were observed in even the oldest group of children. Systematic clusters of consonant errors were observed for children in the noise masker and for adults in both maskers, but not for children in the 2-talker masker.

Conclusions: These results suggest a more prolonged time course of development for consonant identification in a 2-talker masker than in a noise masker. Differences in error patterns between the maskers support the hypothesis that errors with the 2-talker masker reflect failures of sound segregation.

Citing Articles

Speech Recognition and Spatial Hearing in Young Adults With Down Syndrome: Relationships With Hearing Thresholds and Auditory Working Memory.

Anshu K, Kristensen K, Godar S, Zhou X, Hartley S, Litovsky R Ear Hear. 2024; 45(6):1568-1584.

PMID: 39090791 PMC: 11493531. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001549.

The role of long-term target and masker talker familiarity in children's speech-in-speech recognition.

Flaherty M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1369195.

PMID: 38784624 PMC: 11112701. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369195.

Children build their vocabularies in noisy environments: The necessity of a cross-disciplinary approach to understand word learning.

Gordon K, Grieco-Calub T Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023; 15(2):e1671.

PMID: 38043926 PMC: 10939936. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1671.

Behavioral characterization of the cochlear amplifier lesion due to loss of function of stereocilin (STRC) in human subjects.

Benoit C, Carlson R, King M, Horn D, Rubinstein J Hear Res. 2023; 439:108898.

PMID: 37890241 PMC: 10756798. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2023.108898.

Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing.

Lalonde K, Walker E, Leibold L, McCreery R Ear Hear. 2023; 45(1):81-93.

PMID: 37415268 PMC: 10771540. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001403.

References

Wilson R, Farmer N, Gandhi A, Shelburne E, Weaver J . Normative data for the Words-in-Noise Test for 6- to 12-year-old children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010; 53(5):1111-21. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0270). View

Hall J, Buss E, Grose J, Roush P . Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation. Ear Hear. 2012; 33(3):340-8. PMC: 3330172. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31823fa4c3. View

Neuman A, Hochberg I . Children's perception of speech in reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73(6):2145-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.389538. View

Bonino A, Leibold L, Buss E . Release from perceptual masking for children and adults: benefit of a carrier phrase. Ear Hear. 2012; 34(1):3-14. PMC: 3529824. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825e2841. View

Nittrouer S, BOOTHROYD A . Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 87(6):2705-15. DOI: 10.1121/1.399061. View

Eisenberg L, Shannon R, Martinez A, Wygonski J, BOOTHROYD A . Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 107(5 Pt 1):2704-10. DOI: 10.1121/1.428656. View

Freyman R, Helfer K, McCall D, Clifton R . The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000; 106(6):3578-88. DOI: 10.1121/1.428211. View

Phatak S, Allen J . Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121(4):2312-26. DOI: 10.1121/1.2642397. View

Freyman R, Balakrishnan U, Helfer K . Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. DOI: 10.1121/1.1689343. View

10.

Wilson R, CARHART R . Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969; 46(4):998-1010. DOI: 10.1121/1.1911820. View

11.

Kidd Jr G, Mason C, Deliwala P, WOODS W, Colburn H . Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994; 95(6):3475-80. DOI: 10.1121/1.410023. View

12.

Stuart A, Givens G, Walker L, Elangovan S . Auditory temporal resolution in normal-hearing preschool children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119(4):1946-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.2178700. View

13.

Wightman F, Kistler D . Informational masking of speech in children: effects of ipsilateral and contralateral distracters. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 118(5):3164-76. PMC: 2819474. DOI: 10.1121/1.2082567. View

14.

Nishi K, Lewis D, Hoover B, Choi S, Stelmachowicz P . Children's recognition of American English consonants in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127(5):3177-88. PMC: 2882671. DOI: 10.1121/1.3377080. View

15.

STUDEBAKER G . A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res. 1985; 28(3):455-62. DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2803.455. View

16.

Benki J . Analysis of English nonsense syllable recognition in noise. Phonetica. 2003; 60(2):129-57. DOI: 10.1159/000071450. View

17.

Johnson C . Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43(1):144-57. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4301.144. View

18.

Arbogast T, Mason C, Kidd Jr G . The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 112(5 Pt 1):2086-98. DOI: 10.1121/1.1510141. View

19.

Festen J, PLOMP R . Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 88(4):1725-36. DOI: 10.1121/1.400247. View

20.

Brungart D . Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001; 109(3):1101-9. DOI: 10.1121/1.1345696. View