» Articles » PMID: 31021674

Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters

Overview
Date 2019 Apr 26
PMID 31021674
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Previous studies with children and adults have demonstrated a familiar talker advantage-better word recognition for familiar talkers. The goal of the current study was to test whether this phenomenon is modulated by a child's language ability. Method Sixty children with a range of language ability were trained to learn the voices of 3 foreign-accented, German-English bilingual talkers and received feedback about their performance. Both before and after this talker voice training, children completed a spoken word recognition task in which they heard consonant-vowel-consonant words mixed with noise that were spoken by the 3 familiarized talkers and by 3 unfamiliar German-English bilinguals. Results Two findings emerged from this study: First, children with both higher and lower language ability performed similarly on the familiarized talkers. Second, children with higher language scores performed similarly on both the familiarized and unfamiliar talkers, whereas children with lower language scores performed worse on the unfamiliar talkers compared to familiar talkers, suggesting an inability to generalize to novel, unfamiliar talkers who spoke with a similar accent. Discussion Together, these findings indicate that children with higher language scores are able to generalize knowledge about foreign-accented talkers to help spoken word recognition for novel talkers with the same accent. In contrast, children with lower language skills did not exhibit the same magnitude of generalization. This lack of generalization to similar talkers may mean that children with lower language skills are at a disadvantage in spoken language tasks because they are unable to process speech as well when listening to unfamiliar talkers.

Citing Articles

The role of long-term target and masker talker familiarity in children's speech-in-speech recognition.

Flaherty M Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1369195.

PMID: 38784624 PMC: 11112701. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369195.


Level of Vocabulary Development and Selected Elements Regarding Sensory Integration and Balance in 5-Year-Old Girls and Boys.

Wilczynski J, Slezak G Children (Basel). 2021; 8(3).

PMID: 33800019 PMC: 7999570. DOI: 10.3390/children8030200.

References
1.
Case J, Seyfarth S, Levi S . Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018; 61(5):1251-1260. PMC: 6195079. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0298. View

2.
Wright B, Lombardino L, King W, Puranik C, Leonard C, Merzenich M . Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature. 1997; 387(6629):176-8. DOI: 10.1038/387176a0. View

3.
Nygaard L, Sommers M, Pisoni D . SPEECH PERCEPTION AS A TALKER-CONTINGENT PROCESS. Psychol Sci. 2011; 5(1):42-46. PMC: 3081685. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.x. View

4.
Barker B, Newman R . Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition. 2004; 94(2):B45-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.06.001. View

5.
Shafer V, Morr M, Datta H, Kurtzberg D, Schwartz R . Neurophysiological indexes of speech processing deficits in children with specific language impairment. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(7):1168-80. DOI: 10.1162/0898929054475217. View