» Articles » PMID: 38782940

Softly Empowering a Prosocial Expert in the Family: Lasting Effects of a Counter-misinformation Intervention in an Informational Autocracy

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 May 23
PMID 38782940
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present work is the first to comprehensively analyze the gravity of the misinformation problem in Hungary, where misinformation appears regularly in the pro-governmental, populist, and socially conservative mainstream media. In line with international data, using a Hungarian representative sample (Study 1, N = 991), we found that voters of the reigning populist, conservative party could hardly distinguish fake from real news. In Study 2, we demonstrated that a prosocial intervention of ~ 10 min (N = 801) helped young adult participants discern misinformation four weeks later compared to the control group without implementing any boosters. This effect was the most salient regarding pro-governmental conservative fake news content, leaving real news evaluations intact. Although the hypotheses of the present work were not preregistered, it appears that prosocial misinformation interventions might be promising attempts to counter misinformation in an informational autocracy in which the media is highly centralized. Despite using social motivations, it does not mean that long-term cognitive changes cannot occur. Future studies might explore exactly how these interventions can have an impact on the long-term cognitive processing of news content as well as their underlying neural structures.

References
1.
Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S, Goldberg B, Rathje S, Lewandowsky S . Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Sci Adv. 2022; 8(34):eabo6254. PMC: 9401631. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo6254. View

2.
Pennycook G, Rand D . The Psychology of Fake News. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021; 25(5):388-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. View

3.
Pennycook G, Rand D . Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2018; 188:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. View

4.
Yeager D, Dahl R, Dweck C . Why Interventions to Influence Adolescent Behavior Often Fail but Could Succeed. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017; 13(1):101-122. PMC: 5758430. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617722620. View

5.
Farago L, Kreko P, Orosz G . Hungarian, lazy, and biased: the role of analytic thinking and partisanship in fake news discernment on a Hungarian representative sample. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):178. PMC: 9813452. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26724-8. View