» Articles » PMID: 38765847

Comparison of Apathy and Cognitive Symptoms in Pre- and Postoperative Period in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

Overview
Publisher Aves
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2024 May 20
PMID 38765847
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to investigatie apathy and cognitive functions in Parkinson's disease patients who underwent deep brain stimulation surgery on bilateral subthalamic nuclei.

Methods: This study included 18 patients with Parkinson's disease who were accommodated in the Parkinson's and Movement Disorders Center of Adana City Training and Research Hospital for treatment in 2022. Patients were evaluated by psychiatry, neurology and neurosurgery specialists with a multidisciplinary approach and found to be surgically appropriate. Standardized Mini-Mental Test and Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale, Apathy Evaluation Scale, and Hamilton Anxiety and Depression Scale were administered to each patient before the operation and at 6 months after effective stimulation parameters were reached.

Results: The mean apathy score at the preoperative zeroth month was 47.77 ± 15.83 in patients having deep brain stimulation surgery and 30.83 ± 13.59 in the postoperative sixth month. Statistically that reduction was significant ( = .003) and showed clinical development. The average Hamilton Anxiety Scale scores at the preoperative zeroth month was 11.50 ± 5.14 and 10.22 ± 5.57 at the postoperative sixth month, with no clinical significance ( = .280). The determined value for the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, on treatment, was 22.55 ± 7.53 in the preoperative zeroth month and 14.50 ± 6.99 in the postoperative sixth month, with statistical significance (). The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, off treatment, score was revealed to be significant in the preoperative zeroth month (37.44 ± 9.85) in comparison to that of the postoperative sixth month (23.44 ± 7.86; < .001).

Conclusion: This study showed that bilateral subthalamic stimulation improves nonmotor and motor symptoms in patients having Parkinson's disease. The mechanism is complex, and we believe that future studies focusing on pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments involving more patient groups will be useful for clinicians.

Citing Articles

Cognitive aspects of motor control deteriorate while off treatment following subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery in Parkinson's disease.

Munoz M, Arora R, Rivera Y, Drane Q, Pal G, Verhagen Metman L Front Neurol. 2025; 15:1463970.

PMID: 39744112 PMC: 11688652. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1463970.


Exploring the genetic and socioeconomic interplay between ADHD and anxiety disorders using Mendelian randomization.

Deng X, Ren H, Wu S, Jie H, Gu C Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1439474.

PMID: 39165506 PMC: 11333326. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1439474.

References
1.
Bronstein J, Tagliati M, Alterman R, Lozano A, Volkmann J, Stefani A . Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease: an expert consensus and review of key issues. Arch Neurol. 2010; 68(2):165. PMC: 4523130. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.260. View

2.
Lhommee E, Boyer F, Wack M, Pelissier P, Klinger H, Schmitt E . Personality, dopamine, and Parkinson's disease: Insights from subthalamic stimulation. Mov Disord. 2017; 32(8):1191-1200. DOI: 10.1002/mds.27065. View

3.
Krishnan S, Pisharady K, Divya K, Shetty K, Kishore A . Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurol India. 2018; 66(Supplement):S90-S101. DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.226438. View

4.
Williams A, Gill S, Varma T, Jenkinson C, Quinn N, Mitchell R . Deep brain stimulation plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD SURG trial): a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(6):581-91. PMC: 2874872. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70093-4. View

5.
Mestre T, Espay A, Marras C, Eckman M, Pollak P, Lang A . Subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation for early motor complications in Parkinson's disease-the EARLYSTIM trial: early is not always better. Mov Disord. 2014; 29(14):1751-6. DOI: 10.1002/mds.26024. View