» Articles » PMID: 38705183

Measuring the State of Aquatic Environments Using EDNA-upscaling Spatial Resolution of Biotic Indices

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 May 5
PMID 38705183
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aquatic macroinvertebrates, including many aquatic insect orders, are a diverse and ecologically relevant organismal group yet they are strongly affected by anthropogenic activities. As many of these taxa are highly sensitive to environmental change, they offer a particularly good early warning system for human-induced change, thus leading to their intense monitoring. In aquatic ecosystems there is a plethora of biotic monitoring or biomonitoring approaches, with more than 300 assessment methods reported for freshwater taxa alone. Ultimately, monitoring of aquatic macroinvertebrates is used to calculate ecological indices describing the state of aquatic systems. Many of the methods and indices used are not only hard to compare, but especially difficult to scale in time and space. Novel DNA-based approaches to measure the state and change of aquatic environments now offer unprecedented opportunities, also for possible integration towards commonly applicable indices. Here, we first give a perspective on DNA-based approaches in the monitoring of aquatic organisms, with a focus on aquatic insects, and how to move beyond traditional point-based biotic indices. Second, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept for spatially upscaling ecological indices based on environmental DNA, demonstrating how integration of these novel molecular approaches with hydrological models allows an accurate evaluation at the catchment scale. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring'.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of Sampling Techniques in Collecting the Polyp Stage of the Invasive Freshwater Hydrozoan .

Zhu J, Folino-Rorem N Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39194583 PMC: 11351776. DOI: 10.3390/biology13080645.


Measuring the state of aquatic environments using eDNA-upscaling spatial resolution of biotic indices.

Blackman R, Carraro L, Keck F, Altermatt F Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230121.

PMID: 38705183 PMC: 11070250. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0121.


Towards a toolkit for global insect biodiversity monitoring.

van Klink R, Sheard J, Hoye T, Roslin T, Do Nascimento L, Bauer S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230101.

PMID: 38705179 PMC: 11070268. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0101.

References
1.
Cordier T, Forster D, Dufresne Y, Martins C, Stoeck T, Pawlowski J . Supervised machine learning outperforms taxonomy-based environmental DNA metabarcoding applied to biomonitoring. Mol Ecol Resour. 2018; 18(6):1381-1391. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12926. View

2.
Seymour M, Edwards F, Cosby B, Bista I, Scarlett P, Brailsford F . Environmental DNA provides higher resolution assessment of riverine biodiversity and ecosystem function via spatio-temporal nestedness and turnover partitioning. Commun Biol. 2021; 4(1):512. PMC: 8093236. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02031-2. View

3.
Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht E, Zizka V, Lynggaard C . Three steps towards comparability and standardization among molecular methods for characterizing insect communities. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230118. PMC: 11070264. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0118. View

4.
Blackman R, Carraro L, Keck F, Altermatt F . Measuring the state of aquatic environments using eDNA-upscaling spatial resolution of biotic indices. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230121. PMC: 11070250. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0121. View

5.
Pawlowski J, Bonin A, Boyer F, Cordier T, Taberlet P . Environmental DNA for biomonitoring. Mol Ecol. 2021; 30(13):2931-2936. PMC: 8451586. DOI: 10.1111/mec.16023. View