» Articles » PMID: 38680586

Outcomes of a Non-randomised Audit of Single Pigtail Suture Stents in Urolithiasis Management of Asian Patients in Singapore

Overview
Journal Asian J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2024 Apr 29
PMID 38680586
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Double-J (DJ) ureteric stents are commonly placed perioperatively for semirigid or flexible ureteroscopic renal surgery. It is believed that lesser stent material within the bladder mitigates stent-related symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the J-Fil ureteral stent, a single pigtail suture stent compared with conventional DJ stent in relation to stent symptoms in an Asian population undergoing ureterorenal intervention.

Methods: Based on internal audit committee recommendation approval, the records of 50 patients retrieved, available data of 41 patients who were prospectively enrolled into two groups (Group 1 [J-Fil stent group], =21 and Group 2 [DJ stent group], =20) between August 2020 to January 2021, were analysed. Parameters compared were nature of procedure, stone location and size, ease of deployment or removal, and complications. A modified universal stent symptom questionnaire was used to assess morbidity of stent symptoms within 48 h of insertion and at removal.

Results: Both groups had similar median age, distribution in male to female ratio, and stone size. The overall median universal stent symptom questionnaire score at insertion was similar for bladder pain, flank or loin pain, and quality of life between Group 1 and 2; however, at removal Group 1 fared significantly better than Group 2, especially for flank or loin pain and pain at voiding. Both groups had similar ease in insertion with no hospital readmissions.

Conclusion: Our audit favoured the single pigtail suture stent in Asian ureters in mitigating stent-related issues. It showed a good safety profile with easy deployment and removal. It promises a new standard in stenting.

Citing Articles

Letter to the editor for the article "Risk factors of early infectious complications after ureterorenoscopy for stone disease: a prospective study".

Wang Z, Hu M, Li C World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):367.

PMID: 38829537 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05072-4.

References
1.
Miyaoka R, Monga M . Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management. Indian J Urol. 2009; 25(4):455-60. PMC: 2808646. DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.57910. View

2.
Vogt B, Chokri I . Histological Inflammation in Human Ureter either Healthy or Fitted with Double-Pigtail Stent or a Thin 0.3 F Suture Thread: A Preliminary Study. Adv Urol. 2020; 2020:1204897. PMC: 7352140. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1204897. View

3.
Rane A, Saleemi A, Cahill D, Sriprasad S, Shrotri N, Tiptaft R . Have stent-related symptoms anything to do with placement technique?. J Endourol. 2001; 15(7):741-5. DOI: 10.1089/08927790152596352. View

4.
Lingeman J, Preminger G, Goldfischer E, Krambeck A . Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort. J Urol. 2009; 181(6):2581-7. PMC: 3164810. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019. View

5.
Vogt B, Desgrippes A, Desfemmes F . Changing the double-pigtail stent by a new suture stent to improve patient's quality of life: a prospective study. World J Urol. 2014; 33(8):1061-8. PMC: 4512273. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1394-2. View