» Articles » PMID: 34337527

Pigtail Suture Stents Significantly Reduce Stent-related Symptoms Compared to Conventional Double J Stents: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 2
PMID 34337527
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Double J (DJ) ureteral stents are commonly inserted after ureteroscopy (URS) procedures for stone treatment. However, stent-related symptoms are still a major issue.

Objective: To determine whether a commercially available pigtail suture stent (PSS) can reduce stent-related symptoms compared to a conventional DJ stent after uncomplicated URS.

Design Setting And Participants: We designed a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group trial from January to November 2020. The inclusion criteria were stone-free URS without intraprocedural complications. Patients with distal ureteral stones were excluded.

Intervention: Insertion of a PSS or DJ stent after URS.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: The primary endpoint was the Urinary Symptom Index score on the Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ) 2 wk after URS. Secondary endpoints were USSQ domain scores and responses to individual USSQ questions at 2 d and 2 wk after surgery.

Results And Limitations: A total of 78 patients were randomized and treated according to protocol. The Urinary Symptom Index score ( = 0.004), overall Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score ( = 0.022), and the percentage of patients complaining of pain (63.9% vs 86.1%,  = 0.029) were significantly in favor of PSS at both 2 d and 2 wk after URS. At 2 d, the VAS score among patients with pain ( = 0.025) and the General Health Index score ( = 0.036) were significantly better in the PSS group. No severe complications occurred in either group. Study limitations are the exclusion of patients with distal ureteral stones and the limited sample size.

Conclusions: PSS significantly reduced stent-related symptoms after URS, in particular urinary symptoms and pain, compared to conventional DJ stents, and showed a good safety profile.

Patient Summary: Stents are hollow tubes placed in the passage between the kidney and the bladder (ureter). The standard stent has two coiled ends (double J stent) to keep it in place in both the kidney and the bladder. We tested a commercial stent with two strings at the bladder end (pigtail suture stent) after procedures to remove stones from the upper urinary tract and found that it caused less stent-related symptoms compared to a double J stent.

This trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03344120.

Citing Articles

Reply to YuHsiang Lin, ChenPang Hou, and ChunTe Wu's letter to the editor beyond traditional stenting: evaluating pigtail suture stents for reduced ureterorenoscopy symptoms.

Bosio A, Alessandria E, Gontero P World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):481.

PMID: 39133295 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05184-x.


Letter to the editor for the article "Risk factors of early infectious complications after ureterorenoscopy for stone disease: a prospective study".

Wang Z, Hu M, Li C World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):367.

PMID: 38829537 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05072-4.


Reply to Yu‑Hsiang Lin, Chen‑Pang Hou, and Chun‑Te Wu's Letter to the Editor Beyond traditional stenting: evaluating pigtail suture stents for reduced ureterorenoscopy symptoms. World J Urol 42, 255 (2024).

Vogt B World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):327.

PMID: 38750184 PMC: 11096231. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05033-x.


Outcomes of a non-randomised audit of single pigtail suture stents in urolithiasis management of Asian patients in Singapore.

Lim E, Choo Z, Mangat R, Durai P, Biligere S, Tan Y Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(2):324-330.

PMID: 38680586 PMC: 11053326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.013.


Prevention of complications in endourological management of stones: What are the basic measures needed before, during, and after interventions?.

Edison E, Mazzon G, Arumuham V, Choong S Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(2):180-190.

PMID: 38680580 PMC: 11053336. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.04.003.


References
1.
Joshi H, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh R, Keeley Jr F, Timoney A . Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003; 169(3):1060-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d. View

2.
Lingeman J, Preminger G, Goldfischer E, Krambeck A . Assessing the impact of ureteral stent design on patient comfort. J Urol. 2009; 181(6):2581-7. PMC: 3164810. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.019. View

3.
Vogt B, Desgrippes A, Desfemmes F . Changing the double-pigtail stent by a new suture stent to improve patient's quality of life: a prospective study. World J Urol. 2014; 33(8):1061-8. PMC: 4512273. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1394-2. View

4.
Ordonez M, Hwang E, Borofsky M, Bakker C, Gandhi S, Dahm P . Ureteral stent versus no ureteral stent for ureteroscopy in the management of renal and ureteral calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2:CD012703. PMC: 6365118. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012703.pub2. View

5.
Bosio A, Alessandria E, Agosti S, Vitiello F, Vercelli E, Bisconti A . Loop-tail stents fail in reducing stent-related symptoms: results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2021; 129(1):123-129. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15395. View