» Articles » PMID: 19375088

Assessing the Impact of Ureteral Stent Design on Patient Comfort

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Apr 21
PMID 19375088
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the near term comfort of newly designed ureteral study stents or marketed control stents, including Polaris and Percuflex stents. Study stents had distal 6Fr pigtail ends with 3Fr or less loops. Decreased material in situ was hypothesized to enhance comfort. Usefulness of the patient self-administered Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (Stone Management Unit, Southmead Hospital, United Kingdom) was assessed.

Materials And Methods: This 4-arm multicenter study enrolled adults requiring retrograde unilateral ureteral stent placement for 4 to 28 days. Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire administration was done before placement (baseline), on day 4 after placement and on day 30 after removal. A total of 236 patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the short loop tail stent (60), the long loop tail stent (59), the Percuflex Plus stent (64) and the Polaris stent (53).

Results: Overall pain worsened from baseline to day 4 and improved from days 4 to 30. Mean pain medication use peaked for all stents on day 1 after placement. Common device related symptoms were mild or moderate in severity, including flank pain in 47 patients, hematuria in 39, dysuria in 34, frequent urination in 30 and urinary urgency in 27. Six patients experienced a total of 9 device related adverse events requiring hospitalization. All adverse events resolved, including most within 3 days of inpatient treatment.

Conclusions: Although it was not statistically significant, patients stented with the short loop tail had lower questionnaire pain scores on day 4 after placement and lower pain medication use on day 1 after placement when pain peaked in all stent groups, suggesting that ureteral stent comfort, especially pain, may be improved by less material in situ. The Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire may be better suited for longer term comparisons in stented vs nonstented patients, rather than in this short-term ureteral stent trial.

Citing Articles

The Beneficial Effects of Alpha-Blockers, Antimuscarinics, Beta 3-Agonist, and PDE5-Inhibitors for Ureteral Stent-Related Discomfort: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis from KSER Update Series.

Moon Y, Chung D, Kim D, Jung H, Jeon S, Kang S Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005349 PMC: 11857426. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020232.


Reverse placement of a double J ureteral stent improves lower urinary tract symptoms.

Bayar G, Yavuz A, Ofluoglu Y, Yildirim C BMC Urol. 2025; 25(1):38.

PMID: 39994613 PMC: 11849237. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-025-01705-x.


Comparison of the efficacy and complications of tolterodine and α-adrenergic receptor blockers in improving ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu M, Liu S, Mao Q, Zou Q, Cui Y, Wu J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302716.

PMID: 38701097 PMC: 11068181. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302716.


Outcomes of a non-randomised audit of single pigtail suture stents in urolithiasis management of Asian patients in Singapore.

Lim E, Choo Z, Mangat R, Durai P, Biligere S, Tan Y Asian J Urol. 2024; 11(2):324-330.

PMID: 38680586 PMC: 11053326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.013.


Stent diameter and stent-related symptoms, does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ehsanullah S, Bruce A, Juman C, Krishan A, Krishan A, Higginbottom J Urol Ann. 2022; 14(4):295-302.

PMID: 36505999 PMC: 9731185. DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_158_21.


References
1.
Lee C, Kuskowski M, Premoli J, Skemp N, Monga M . Randomized evaluation of Ureteral Stents using validated Symptom Questionnaire. J Endourol. 2005; 19(8):990-3. DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.990. View

2.
Lennon G, Thornhill J, Sweeney P, Grainger R, McDermott T, Butler M . 'Firm' versus 'soft' double pigtail ureteric stents: a randomised blind comparative trial. Eur Urol. 1995; 28(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1159/000475010. View

3.
Joshi H, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh R, Keeley Jr F, Timoney A . Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol. 2003; 169(3):1060-4. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424.1d. View

4.
Pryor J, Langley M, JENKINS A . Comparison of symptom characteristics of indwelling ureteral catheters. J Urol. 1991; 145(4):719-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38433-1. View

5.
Saltzman B . Ureteral stents. Indications, variations, and complications. Urol Clin North Am. 1988; 15(3):481-91. View