» Articles » PMID: 38680075

Executive Functions and Brain Morphology of Male and Female Dominant and Subordinate Cichlid Fish

Overview
Journal Brain Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Apr 29
PMID 38680075
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Living in a social dominance hierarchy presents different benefits and challenges for dominant and subordinate males and females, which might in turn affect their cognitive needs. Despite the extensive research on social dominance in group-living species, there is still a knowledge gap regarding how social status impacts brain morphology and cognitive abilities.

Methods: Here, we tested male and female dominants and subordinates of Neolamprologus pulcher, a social cichlid fish species with size-based hierarchy. We ran three executive cognitive function tests for cognitive flexibility (reversal learning test), self-control (detour test), and working memory (object permanence test), followed by brain and brain region size measurements.

Results: Performance was not influenced by social status or sex. However, dominants exhibited a brain-body slope that was relatively steeper than that of subordinates. Furthermore, individual performance in reversal learning and detour tests correlated with brain morphology, with some trade-offs among major brain regions like telencephalon, cerebellum, and optic tectum.

Conclusion: As individuals' brain growth strategies varied depending on social status without affecting executive functions, the different associated challenges might yield a potential effect on social cognition instead. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of studying the individual and not just species to understand better how the individual's ecology might shape its brain and cognition.

Citing Articles

Executive functions and brain morphology of male and female dominant and subordinate cichlid fish.

Guadagno A, Triki Z Brain Behav. 2024; 14(5):e3484.

PMID: 38680075 PMC: 11056711. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3484.


Social complexity affects cognitive abilities but not brain structure in a Poeciliid fish.

Triki Z, Zhou T, Argyriou E, Sousa de Novais E, Servant O, Kolm N Behav Ecol. 2024; 35(3):arae026.

PMID: 38638166 PMC: 11025466. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae026.

References
1.
Triki Z, Granell-Ruiz M, Fong S, Amcoff M, Kolm N . Brain morphology correlates of learning and cognitive flexibility in a fish species (). Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1978):20220844. PMC: 9277233. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0844. View

2.
Bielecki J, Dam Nielsen S, Nachman G, Garm A . Associative learning in the box jellyfish Tripedalia cystophora. Curr Biol. 2023; 33(19):4150-4159.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.08.056. View

3.
Uddin L . Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical considerations. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021; 22(3):167-179. PMC: 7856857. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-021-00428-w. View

4.
MacLean E, Hare B, Nunn C, Addessi E, Amici F, Anderson R . The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(20):E2140-8. PMC: 4034204. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323533111. View

5.
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T . Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(7):676-82. PMC: 3855844. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. View