» Articles » PMID: 35000437

The Centennial of the Pecking Order: Current State and Future Prospects for the Study of Dominance Hierarchies

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jan 10
PMID 35000437
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A century ago, foundational work by Thorleif Schjelderup-Ebbe described a 'pecking order' in chicken societies, where individuals could be ordered according to their ability to exert their influence over their group-mates. Now known as dominance hierarchies, these structures have been shown to influence a plethora of individual characteristics and outcomes, situating dominance research as a pillar of the study of modern social ecology and evolution. Here, we first review some of the major questions that have been answered about dominance hierarchies in the last 100 years. Next, we introduce the contributions to this theme issue and summarize how they provide ongoing insight in the epistemology, physiology and neurobiology, hierarchical structure, and dynamics of dominance. These contributions employ the full range of research approaches available to modern biologists. Cross-cutting themes emerging from these contributions include a focus on cognitive underpinnings of dominance, the application of network-analytical approaches, and the utility of experimental rank manipulations for revealing causal relationships. Reflection on the last 100 years of dominance research reveals how Schjelderup-Ebbe's early ideas and the subsequent research helped drive a shift from an essentialist view of species characteristics to the modern recognition of rich inter-individual variation in social, behavioural and physiological phenotypes. This article is part of the theme issue 'The centennial of the pecking order: current state and future prospects for the study of dominance hierarchies'.

Citing Articles

Social dominance influences individual susceptibility to an evolutionary trap in mosquitofish.

Pollack L, Culshaw-Maurer M, Sih A Ecol Appl. 2025; 35(1):e3081.

PMID: 39829287 PMC: 11744343. DOI: 10.1002/eap.3081.


Long-term cooperative relationships among vampire bats are not strongly predicted by their initial interactions.

Carter G, Ripperger S, Girbino V, Dixon M, Razik I, Page R Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024; 1541(1):129-139.

PMID: 39462880 PMC: 11580772. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.15241.


Hierarchies inferred from different agonistic behaviours are not always comparable.

Smit N J Anim Ecol. 2024; 93(12):1947-1959.

PMID: 39435973 PMC: 11615268. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.14203.


Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis based on different aggressive pecking phenotype in duck.

Zhu B, Zhu J, Liu A, Yao B, Liao F, Yang S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):22321.

PMID: 39333746 PMC: 11436778. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73726-9.


Executive functions and brain morphology of male and female dominant and subordinate cichlid fish.

Guadagno A, Triki Z Brain Behav. 2024; 14(5):e3484.

PMID: 38680075 PMC: 11056711. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3484.


References
1.
Tibbetts E, Pardo-Sanchez J, Weise C . The establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1845):20200450. PMC: 8743888. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0450. View

2.
Dehnen T, Arbon J, Farine D, Boogert N . How feedback and feed-forward mechanisms link determinants of social dominance. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022; 97(3):1210-1230. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12838. View

3.
Shimoji H, S Abe M, Tsuji K, Masuda N . Global network structure of dominance hierarchy of ant workers. J R Soc Interface. 2014; 11(99). PMC: 4233739. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0599. View

4.
Anderson J, Lea A, Voyles T, Akinyi M, Nyakundi R, Ochola L . Distinct gene regulatory signatures of dominance rank and social bond strength in wild baboons. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1845):20200441. PMC: 8743882. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0441. View

5.
ROWELL T . The concept of social dominance. Behav Biol. 1974; 11(2):131-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(74)90289-2. View