» Articles » PMID: 38658534

Cell Painting-based Bioactivity Prediction Boosts High-throughput Screening Hit-rates and Compound Diversity

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Apr 24
PMID 38658534
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identifying active compounds for a target is a time- and resource-intensive task in early drug discovery. Accurate bioactivity prediction using morphological profiles could streamline the process, enabling smaller, more focused compound screens. We investigate the potential of deep learning on unrefined single-concentration activity readouts and Cell Painting data, to predict compound activity across 140 diverse assays. We observe an average ROC-AUC of 0.744 ± 0.108 with 62% of assays achieving ≥0.7, 30% ≥0.8, and 7% ≥0.9. In many cases, the high prediction performance can be achieved using only brightfield images instead of multichannel fluorescence images. A comprehensive analysis shows that Cell Painting-based bioactivity prediction is robust across assay types, technologies, and target classes, with cell-based assays and kinase targets being particularly well-suited for prediction. Experimental validation confirms the enrichment of active compounds. Our findings indicate that models trained on Cell Painting data, combined with a small set of single-concentration data points, can reliably predict the activity of a compound library across diverse targets and assays while maintaining high hit rates and scaffold diversity. This approach has the potential to reduce the size of screening campaigns, saving time and resources, and enabling primary screening with more complex assays.

Citing Articles

Evaluating feature extraction in ovarian cancer cell line co-cultures using deep neural networks.

Sharma O, Gudoityte G, Minozada R, Kallioniemi O, Turkki R, Paavolainen L Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):303.

PMID: 40000764 PMC: 11862010. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07766-w.


A highly efficient, scalable pipeline for fixed feature extraction from large-scale high-content imaging screens.

Comolet G, Bose N, Winchell J, Duren-Lubanski A, Rusielewicz T, Goldberg J iScience. 2024; 27(12):111434.

PMID: 39720532 PMC: 11667173. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111434.


Cell Painting: a decade of discovery and innovation in cellular imaging.

Seal S, Trapotsi M, Spjuth O, Singh S, Carreras-Puigvert J, Greene N Nat Methods. 2024; 22(2):254-268.

PMID: 39639168 PMC: 11810604. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02528-8.


Insights into the Identification of iPSC- and Monocyte-Derived Macrophage-Polarizing Compounds by AI-Fueled Cell Painting Analysis Tools.

Bruggenthies J, Dittmer J, Martin E, Zingman I, Tabet I, Bronner H Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596395 PMC: 11595184. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212330.


Low concentration cell painting images enable the identification of highly potent compounds.

Ha S, Jaensch S, Freitas L, Herman D, Czodrowski P, Ceulemans H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24403.

PMID: 39420056 PMC: 11487191. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75401-5.

References
1.
Cumming J, Davis A, Muresan S, Haeberlein M, Chen H . Chemical predictive modelling to improve compound quality. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013; 12(12):948-62. DOI: 10.1038/nrd4128. View

2.
Riniker S, Wang Y, Jenkins J, Landrum G . Using information from historical high-throughput screens to predict active compounds. J Chem Inf Model. 2014; 54(7):1880-91. DOI: 10.1021/ci500190p. View

3.
Petrone P, Simms B, Nigsch F, Lounkine E, Kutchukian P, Cornett A . Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity. ACS Chem Biol. 2012; 7(8):1399-409. DOI: 10.1021/cb3001028. View

4.
Laufkotter O, Sturm N, Bajorath J, Chen H, Engkvist O . Combining structural and bioactivity-based fingerprints improves prediction performance and scaffold hopping capability. J Cheminform. 2019; 11(1):54. PMC: 6686534. DOI: 10.1186/s13321-019-0376-1. View

5.
Sturm N, Sun J, Vandriessche Y, Mayr A, Klambauer G, Carlsson L . Application of Bioactivity Profile-Based Fingerprints for Building Machine Learning Models. J Chem Inf Model. 2018; 59(3):962-972. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00550. View