» Articles » PMID: 30103448

Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2018 Aug 15
PMID 30103448
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Toxicity prediction is very important to public health. Among its many applications, toxicity prediction is essential to reduce the cost and labor of a drug's preclinical and clinical trials, because a lot of drug evaluations (cellular, animal, and clinical) can be spared due to the predicted toxicity. In the era of Big Data and artificial intelligence, toxicity prediction can benefit from machine learning, which has been widely used in many fields such as natural language processing, speech recognition, image recognition, computational chemistry, and bioinformatics, with excellent performance. In this article, we review machine learning methods that have been applied to toxicity prediction, including deep learning, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machines. We also discuss the input parameter to the machine learning algorithm, especially its shift from chemical structural description only to that combined with human transcriptome data analysis, which can greatly enhance prediction accuracy.

Citing Articles

Hepatotoxicity Evaluation of Levornidazole and Its Three Main Impurities: Based on Structure-Toxicity Classification Prediction Combined with Zebrafish Toxicity Assessment.

Liu T, Yuan S, Zhang L, Zhang D Molecules. 2025; 30(5).

PMID: 40076220 PMC: 11901814. DOI: 10.3390/molecules30050995.


Bridging organ transcriptomics for advancing multiple organ toxicity assessment with a generative AI approach.

Li T, Chen X, Tong W NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):310.

PMID: 39501092 PMC: 11538515. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01317-z.


Thyroid Hormone Biomonitoring: A Review on Their Metabolism and Machine-Learning Based Analysis on Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.

Chen S, Yu M, Yao Y, Li Y, He A, Zhou Z Environ Health (Wash). 2024; 2(6):350-372.

PMID: 39473465 PMC: 11503987. DOI: 10.1021/envhealth.3c00184.


A Systematic Review of Genetics- and Molecular-Pathway-Based Machine Learning Models for Neurological Disorder Diagnosis.

Aljarallah N, Dutta A, Sait A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(12).

PMID: 38928128 PMC: 11203850. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25126422.


Gap-Δenergy, a New Metric of the Bond Energy State, Assisting to Predict Molecular Toxicity.

Zhang S, Zhao D, Cui Q ACS Omega. 2024; 9(16):17839-17847.

PMID: 38680329 PMC: 11044234. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c07682.


References
1.
Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash A . Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 30(1):207-10. PMC: 99122. DOI: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. View

2.
Johnson D . Fusion of nonclinical and clinical data to predict human drug safety. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2013; 6(2):185-95. DOI: 10.1586/ecp.13.3. View

3.
Cammarata A, Menon G . Pattern recognition. Classification of therapeutic agents according to pharmacophores. J Med Chem. 1976; 19(6):739-48. DOI: 10.1021/jm00228a001. View

4.
Hwang T, Carpenter D, Lauffenburger J, Wang B, Franklin J, Kesselheim A . Failure of Investigational Drugs in Late-Stage Clinical Development and Publication of Trial Results. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(12):1826-1833. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.6008. View

5.
Kim S, Thiessen P, Bolton E, Chen J, Fu G, Gindulyte A . PubChem Substance and Compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 44(D1):D1202-13. PMC: 4702940. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv951. View