» Articles » PMID: 38630820

A Macroevolutionary Role for Chromosomal Fusion and Fission in Butterflies

Overview
Journal Sci Adv
Specialties Biology
Science
Date 2024 Apr 17
PMID 38630820
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The impact of large-scale chromosomal rearrangements, such as fusions and fissions, on speciation is a long-standing conundrum. We assessed whether bursts of change in chromosome numbers resulting from chromosomal fusion or fission are related to increased speciation rates in , one of the most species-rich and karyotypically variable butterfly groups. We established a genome-based phylogeny and used state-dependent birth-death models to infer trajectories of karyotype evolution. We demonstrated that rates of anagenetic chromosomal changes (i.e., along phylogenetic branches) exceed cladogenetic changes (i.e., at speciation events), but, when cladogenetic changes occur, they are mostly associated with chromosomal fissions rather than fusions. We found that the relative importance of fusion and fission differs among clades of different ages and that especially in younger, more karyotypically diverse clades, speciation is more frequently associated with cladogenetic chromosomal changes. Overall, our results imply that chromosomal fusions and fissions have contrasting macroevolutionary roles and that large-scale chromosomal rearrangements are associated with bursts of species diversification.

Citing Articles

Phylogeographic analyses reveal recent dispersal and multiple Wolbachia infections of the bright-eyed ringlet Erebia oeme within the European mountain systems.

Mewis V, Wendt M, Schmitt T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1956.

PMID: 39809813 PMC: 11733208. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84551-5.


Repeat-based holocentromeres of the woodrush Luzula sylvatica reveal insights into the evolutionary transition to holocentricity.

Mata-Sucre Y, Kratka M, Oliveira L, Neumann P, Macas J, Schubert V Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):9565.

PMID: 39500889 PMC: 11538461. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53944-5.


Chromosome-level genome and population genomics of the intermediate horseshoe bat ( reveal the molecular basis of virus tolerance in and echolocation call frequency variation.

Zhao L, Yuan J, Wang G, Jing H, Huang C, Xu L Zool Res. 2024; 45(5):1147-1160.

PMID: 39257377 PMC: 11491789. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2024.027.


Annelid Comparative Genomics and the Evolution of Massive Lineage-Specific Genome Rearrangement in Bilaterians.

Lewin T, Liao I, Luo Y Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(9).

PMID: 39141777 PMC: 11371463. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae172.


Meiotic drive against chromosome fusions in butterfly hybrids.

Boman J, Wiklund C, Vila R, Backstrom N Chromosome Res. 2024; 32(2):7.

PMID: 38702576 PMC: 11068667. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-024-09752-0.


References
1.
Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B . AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34(Web Server issue):W435-9. PMC: 1538822. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl200. View

2.
Beaulieu J, OMeara B . Detecting Hidden Diversification Shifts in Models of Trait-Dependent Speciation and Extinction. Syst Biol. 2016; 65(4):583-601. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw022. View

3.
Yoshida K, Rodelsperger C, Roseler W, Riebesell M, Sun S, Kikuchi T . Chromosome fusions repatterned recombination rate and facilitated reproductive isolation during Pristionchus nematode speciation. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023; 7(3):424-439. PMC: 9998273. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-022-01980-z. View

4.
Lanfear R, Frandsen P, Wright A, Senfeld T, Calcott B . PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2016; 34(3):772-773. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msw260. View

5.
Lukhtanov V, Dinca V, Friberg M, Sichova J, Olofsson M, Vila R . Versatility of multivalent orientation, inverted meiosis, and rescued fitness in holocentric chromosomal hybrids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(41):E9610-E9619. PMC: 6187165. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802610115. View