» Articles » PMID: 38702576

Meiotic Drive Against Chromosome Fusions in Butterfly Hybrids

Overview
Journal Chromosome Res
Date 2024 May 3
PMID 38702576
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Species frequently differ in the number and structure of chromosomes they harbor, but individuals that are heterozygous for chromosomal rearrangements may suffer from reduced fitness. Chromosomal rearrangements like fissions and fusions can hence serve as a mechanism for speciation between incipient lineages, but their evolution poses a paradox. How can rearrangements get fixed between populations if heterozygotes have reduced fitness? One solution is that this process predominantly occurs in small and isolated populations, where genetic drift can override natural selection. However, fixation is also more likely if a novel rearrangement is favored by a transmission bias, such as meiotic drive. Here, we investigate chromosomal transmission distortion in hybrids between two wood white (Leptidea sinapis) butterfly populations with extensive karyotype differences. Using data from two different crossing experiments, we uncover that there is a transmission bias favoring the ancestral chromosomal state for derived fusions, a result that shows that chromosome fusions actually can fix in populations despite being counteracted by meiotic drive. This means that meiotic drive not only can promote runaway chromosome number evolution and speciation, but also that it can be a conservative force acting against karyotypic change and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Based on our results, we suggest a mechanistic model for why chromosome fusion mutations may be opposed by meiotic drive and discuss factors contributing to karyotype evolution in Lepidoptera.

Citing Articles

Cryptic Taxa Revealed through Combined Analysis of Chromosomes and DNA Barcodes: The Species Complex in Armenia and NW Iran.

Lukhtanov V, Dantchenko A Insects. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057277 PMC: 11277131. DOI: 10.3390/insects15070545.


Genomic evidence reveals three W-autosome fusions in Heliconius butterflies.

Rueda-M N, Pardo-Diaz C, Montejo-Kovacevich G, McMillan W, Kozak K, Arias C PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(7):e1011318.

PMID: 39024186 PMC: 11257349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011318.

References
1.
Schlotterer C, Tobler R, Kofler R, Nolte V . Sequencing pools of individuals - mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding. Nat Rev Genet. 2014; 15(11):749-63. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3803. View

2.
Guerrero R, Kirkpatrick M . Local adaptation and the evolution of chromosome fusions. Evolution. 2014; 68(10):2747-56. DOI: 10.1111/evo.12481. View

3.
Drinnenberg I, deYoung D, Henikoff S, Malik H . Recurrent loss of CenH3 is associated with independent transitions to holocentricity in insects. Elife. 2014; 3. PMC: 4359364. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.03676. View

4.
Smith D . Evidence for autosomal meiotic drive in the butterfly Danaus chrysippus L. Heredity (Edinb). 1976; 36(1):139-42. DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1976.13. View

5.
Phadnis N, Orr H . A single gene causes both male sterility and segregation distortion in Drosophila hybrids. Science. 2008; 323(5912):376-9. PMC: 2628965. DOI: 10.1126/science.1163934. View