» Articles » PMID: 27804966

A Comparative Study on Karyotypic Diversification Rate in Mammals

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2016 Nov 3
PMID 27804966
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements have a relevant role in organismic evolution. However, little is known about the mechanisms that lead different phylogenetic clades to have different chromosomal rearrangement rates. Here, we investigate the causes behind the wide karyotypic diversity exhibited by mammals. In particular, we analyzed the role of metabolic, reproductive, biogeographic and genomic characteristics on the rates of macro- and microstructural karyotypic diversification (rKD) using comparative phylogenetic methods. We found evidence that reproductive characteristics such as larger litter size per year and longevity, by allowing a higher number of meioses in absolute time, favor a higher probability of chromosomal change. Furthermore, families with large geographic distributions but containing species with restricted geographic ranges showed a greater probability of fixation of macrostructural chromosomal changes in different geographic areas. Finally, rKD does not evolve by Brownian motion because the mutation rate depends on the concerted evolution of repetitive sequences. The decisive factors of rKD evolution will be natural selection, genetic drift and meiotic drive that will eventually allow or not the fixation of the rearrangements. Our results indicate that mammalian karyotypic diversity is influenced by historical and adaptive mechanisms where reproductive and genomic factors modulate the rate of chromosomal change.

Citing Articles

A macroevolutionary role for chromosomal fusion and fission in butterflies.

Augustijnen H, Batscher L, Cesanek M, Chkhartishvili T, Dinca V, Iankoshvili G Sci Adv. 2024; 10(16):eadl0989.

PMID: 38630820 PMC: 11023530. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl0989.


The state of Medusozoa genomics: current evidence and future challenges.

Santander M, Maronna M, Ryan J, Andrade S Gigascience. 2022; 11.

PMID: 35579552 PMC: 9112765. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giac036.


Genome size versus geographic range size in birds.

Grzywacz B, Skorka P PeerJ. 2021; 9:e10868.

PMID: 33614292 PMC: 7881720. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10868.


Speciation through chromosomal fusion and fission in Lepidoptera.

de Vos J, Augustijnen H, Batscher L, Lucek K Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1806):20190539.

PMID: 32654638 PMC: 7423279. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0539.


Ancestral Reconstruction of Karyotypes Reveals an Exceptional Rate of Nonrandom Chromosomal Evolution in Sunflower.

Ostevik K, Samuk K, Rieseberg L Genetics. 2020; 214(4):1031-1045.

PMID: 32033968 PMC: 7153943. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303026.


References
1.
Pagel M . Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999; 401(6756):877-84. DOI: 10.1038/44766. View

2.
Britton-Davidian J, Catalan J, Ramalhinho M, Ganem G, Auffray J, Capela R . Rapid chromosomal evolution in island mice. Nature. 2000; 403(6766):158. DOI: 10.1038/35003116. View

3.
Barja G, Herrero A . Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA is inversely related to maximum life span in the heart and brain of mammals. FASEB J. 2000; 14(2):312-8. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.14.2.312. View

4.
Garagna S, Marziliano N, Zuccotti M, Searle J, Capanna E, Redi C . Pericentromeric organization at the fusion point of mouse Robertsonian translocation chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(1):171-5. PMC: 14563. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.98.1.171. View

5.
Rieseberg L . Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001; 16(7):351-358. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5. View