» Articles » PMID: 38613692

Ureteral Stricture Rate After Endoscopic Treatments for Urolithiasis and Related Risk Factors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to accurately determine ureteral stricture (US) rates following urolithiasis treatments and their related risk factors.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines using databases from inception to November 2023. Studies were deemed eligible for analysis if they included ≥ 18 years old patients with urinary lithiasis (Patients) who were subjected to endoscopic treatment (Intervention) with ureteroscopy (URS), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), or shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (Comparator) to assess the incidence of US (Outcome) in prospective and retrospective studies (Study design).

Results: A total of 43 studies were included. The pooled US rate was 1.3% post-SWL and 2.1% post-PCNL. The pooled rate of US post-URS was 1.9% but raised to 2.7% considering the last five years' studies and 4.9% if the stone was impacted. Moreover, the pooled US rate differed if follow-ups were under or over six months. Patients with proximal ureteral stone, preoperative hydronephrosis, intraoperative ureteral perforation, and impacted stones showed higher US risk post-endoscopic intervention with odds ratio of 1.6 (P = 0.05), 2.6 (P = 0.009), 7.1 (P < 0.001), and 7.47 (P = 0.003), respectively.

Conclusions: The overall US rate ranges from 0.3 to 4.9%, with an increasing trend in the last few years. It is influenced by type of treatment, stone location and impaction, preoperative hydronephrosis and intraoperative perforation. Future standardized reporting and prospective and more extended follow-up studies might contribute to a better understanding of US risks related to calculi treatment.

Citing Articles

Antibiotic prophylaxis in stone surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Gavi F, Ragonese M, Fettucciari D, Sighinolfi M, Turri F, Panio E World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):144.

PMID: 40029456 PMC: 11876188. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05528-1.


Comment on: "Comparative perioperative outcomes of intravenous indocyanine green during robot-assisted cystectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review".

Wang K, Yang L J Robot Surg. 2025; 19(1):89.

PMID: 40019605 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02264-x.


Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy: a retrospective comparative study in high-risk patients with positive preoperative urine cultures.

Liang J, Shen Z, Xie L, Li C, Qi X, Liu C World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):128.

PMID: 39961857 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05510-x.


What is the preferred management of lower ureteral stones? SWL or URS - a critical evaluation with an emphasis on the changes in patient's quality of life.

Erdogan E, Asik A, Yasar H, Sarica G, Sarica K Urolithiasis. 2025; 53(1):29.

PMID: 39945870 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-025-01693-5.


Constructing a machine learning model for systemic infection after kidney stone surgery based on CT values.

Li J, Du Y, Huang G, Huang Y, Xi X, Ye Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4327.

PMID: 39910162 PMC: 11799361. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88704-y.


References
1.
Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A, Sindhwani P, Ekwenna O . Global Trends in Incidence and Burden of Urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: An Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study Data. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 35:37-46. PMC: 8738898. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.008. View

2.
De Coninck V, Keller E, Somani B, Giusti G, Proietti S, Rodriguez-Socarras M . Complications of ureteroscopy: a complete overview. World J Urol. 2019; 38(9):2147-2166. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03012-1. View

3.
Tonyali S, Yilmaz M, Tzelves L, Emiliani E, De Coninck V, Keller E . Predictors of Ureteral Strictures after Retrograde Ureteroscopic Treatment of Impacted Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Literature Review. J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10). PMC: 10218913. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103603. View

4.
Knoll T, Omar M, MacLennan S, Hernandez V, Canfield S, Yuan Y . Key Steps in Conducting Systematic Reviews for Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines: Methodology of the European Association of Urology. Eur Urol. 2017; 73(2):290-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.016. View

5.
Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M . Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:1. PMC: 4320440. DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. View