» Articles » PMID: 11743269

Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi in 598 Patients

Overview
Journal J Urol
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Urology
Date 2001 Dec 18
PMID 11743269
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for managing upper urinary tract calculi in a prospective cohort of 598 patients.

Materials And Methods: Ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy was performed in 598 patients between 1993 and 1999. Calculi were located in the distal ureter in 39.6% of cases, mid ureter in 18.6%, proximal ureter in 32.4% and kidney in 9.4%. Patients were treated on an outpatient basis with various flexible and semirigid endoscopes. Of the cases 59% were referred as previous treatment failures. Patients were assessed 6 to 12 weeks postoperatively with repeat plain x-ray and ultrasound or excretory urography for late obstructive complications.

Results: The overall stone-free rate was 97%. As stratified by location, the stone-free rate was 98% in the distal ureter, 100% in the mid ureter, 97% in the proximal ureter and 84% in the kidney. Fragmentation was incomplete in 6% of cases and secondary intervention was required in 6%. The overall complication rate was 4%. New onset ureteral stricture developed postoperatively in 0.35% of patients.

Conclusions: Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy is a highly effective and safe treatment modality for managing ureteral and a proportion of intrarenal calculi on an outpatient basis. The effectiveness and versatility of the holmium laser combined with small rigid or flexible endoscopes make it our modality of choice for ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Citing Articles

Stone-event-free survival after retrograde intrarenal surgery: is the stone-free-status so relevant for the future outcomes?.

Mesquita S, Mendes G, Marques-Monteiro M, Rocha M, Madanelo M, Fraga A Int Urol Nephrol. 2024; .

PMID: 39731646 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-024-04343-8.


For upper ureteral stone, semirigid ureteroscopy or flexible ureteroscopy? Strengths and weaknesses.

Wu W, Wan W, Yang J, Amier Y, Li X, Zhang J BMC Urol. 2024; 24(1):261.

PMID: 39614239 PMC: 11605917. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01647-w.


Steady-state versus burst lasing techniques for thulium fiber laser.

Sierra A, Solano C, Corrales M, Ventimiglia E, Panthier F, Kwok J World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):487.

PMID: 39158747 PMC: 11333515. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05102-1.


Analyzing global research trends and focal points in the utilization of laser techniques for the treatment of urolithiasis from 1978 to 2022: visualization and bibliometric analysis.

Abushamma F, Zyoud S Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):67.

PMID: 38630266 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01568-1.


Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Moretto S, Saita A, Scoffone C, Talso M, Somani B, Traxer O World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):234.

PMID: 38613692 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04933-2.