What is the Preferred Management of Lower Ureteral Stones? SWL or URS - a Critical Evaluation with an Emphasis on the Changes in Patient's Quality of Life

Overview

Journal Urolithiasis

Publisher Springer

Specialty Urology

Date 2025 Feb 13

PMID 39945870

Authors

Erhan Erdogan

Alper Asik

Hikmet Yasar

Goksu Sarica

Kemal Sarica

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

To compare the efficacy and safety of two treatment methods for lower ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopic treatment (URS), with a focus on the impact on patients' Quality of Life (QoL). A total of 174 patients with solitary radiopaque lower ureteral stones (5-10 mm) between July 2023 and October 2024 were treated with SWL (78 patients) or URS (96 patients). Stone-free (SF) status was evaluated at 3 months using Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT). Data included age, gender, body mass index (BMI), stone size, and post-procedural analgesic requirement. QoL was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) index. Although SF rates were significantly higher in the URS group (96.9% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.009), comparable SF rates for stones < 10 mm and symptom-free status during long-term follow-up suggest that SWL remains a valuable alternative. Additionally, 96.2% of patients expressed willingness to choose SWL again, highlighting patient satisfaction. SWL produced similar results to URS in physical functioning and general health, but URS showed better outcomes in pain and emotional well-being, possibly due to residual stone fragments. SWL offers advantages such as shorter recovery times, reduced need for pain medication, and no requirement for general anesthesia, making it a preferred option for patients seeking non-invasive treatment. Both methods showed similar outcomes in QoL, particularly in physical functioning and general health, demonstrating that SWL is an effective non-invasive treatment for lower ureteric stones.

References

Kashi A, Zobeiry M, Basiri A, Borumandnia N, Taheri M, Zahir M . Familial aggregation of urolithiasis: findings from a Nationwide Middle Eastern study. Urolithiasis. 2024; 52(1):119. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01618-8. View

Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone C, Cracco C, Celia A, Paccaduscio A . Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol. 2015; 34(3):305-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1642-0. View

Moretto S, Saita A, Scoffone C, Talso M, Somani B, Traxer O . An international delphi survey and consensus meeting to define the risk factors for ureteral stricture after endoscopic treatment for urolithiasis. World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):412. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05103-0. View

Sunaryo P, May P, Holt S, Sorensen M, Sweet R, Harper J . Ureteral Strictures Following Ureteroscopy for Kidney Stone Disease: A Population-based Assessment. J Urol. 2022; 208(6):1268-1275. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002929. View

Moretto S, Saita A, Scoffone C, Talso M, Somani B, Traxer O . Ureteral stricture rate after endoscopic treatments for urolithiasis and related risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):234. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04933-2. View

Turna B, Akbay K, Ekren F, Nazli O, Apaydin E, Semerci B . Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2007; 40(1):23-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-007-9214-x. View

Tiselius H . Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?. Urol Res. 2005; 33(3):185-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-005-0462-x. View

Teichman J . Clinical practice. Acute renal colic from ureteral calculus. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(7):684-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp030813. View

Rabah D, Alomar M, Binsaleh S, Arafa M . Health related quality of life in ureteral stone patients: post-ureterolithiasis. Urol Res. 2011; 39(5):385-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0375-9. View

10.

Stewart G, Bariol S, Moussa S, Smith G, Tolley D . Matched pair analysis of ureteroscopy vs. shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of upper ureteric calculi. Int J Clin Pract. 2007; 61(5):784-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01296.x. View

11.

Bagley D . Expanding role of ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for treatment of proximal ureteral and intrarenal calculi. Curr Opin Urol. 2002; 12(4):277-80. DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200207000-00003. View

12.

Karlsen S, Renkel J, Tahir A, Angelsen A, Diep L . Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for 5- to 10-mm stones in the proximal ureter: Prospective effectiveness patient-preference trial. J Endourol. 2007; 21(1):28-33. DOI: 10.1089/end.2006.0153. View

13.

Ziaee S, Halimiasl P, Aminsharifi A, Shafi H, Beigi F, Basiri A . Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?. Urology. 2008; 71(1):28-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.025. View

14.

Yencilek F, Sarica K, Erturhan S, Yagci F, Erbagci A . Treatment of ureteral calculi with semirigid ureteroscopy: where should we stop?. Urol Int. 2010; 84(3):260-4. DOI: 10.1159/000288225. View

15.

Lee Y, Tsai J, Jiaan B, Wu T, Yu C . Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones. Urology. 2006; 67(3):480-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.09.067. View

16.

Scarpa R, De Lisa A, Porru D, Usai E . Holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy. Eur Urol. 1999; 35(3):233-8. DOI: 10.1159/000019852. View

17.

Verze P, Imbimbo C, Cancelmo G, Creta M, Palmieri A, Mangiapia F . Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy as first-line therapy for patients with single, distal ureteric stones: a prospective randomized study. BJU Int. 2010; 106(11):1748-52. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09338.x. View

18.

Hamamoto S, Unno R, Taguchi K, Naiki T, Ando R, Okada A . Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy. Urolithiasis. 2017; 46(2):203-210. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-0972-3. View

19.

Turk T, JENKINS A . A comparison of ureteroscopy to in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. J Urol. 1999; 161(1):45-6; discussion 46-7. View

20.

El-Assmy A, El-Nahas A, Youssef R, El-Hefnawy A, Sheir K . Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?. Urology. 2007; 69(3):431-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010. View