» Articles » PMID: 38506618

Impact of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction Methods on MRI Throughput

Overview
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38506618
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effect of implementing two distinct commercially available deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithms on the efficiency of MRI examinations conducted in real clinical practice within an outpatient setting at a large, multicenter institution. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 7346 examinations from 10 clinical MRI scanners analyzed during the pre- and postimplementation periods of DLR methods. Two different types of DLR methods, namely Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)-based and k-space-based methods, were implemented in half of the scanners (three DICOM-based and two k-space-based), while the remaining five scanners had no DLR method implemented. Scan and room times of each examination type during the pre- and postimplementation periods were compared among the different DLR methods using the Wilcoxon test. Results The application of deep learning methods resulted in significant reductions in scan and room times for certain examination types. The DICOM-based method demonstrated up to a 53% reduction in scan times and a 41% reduction in room times for various study types. The k-space-based method demonstrated up to a 27% reduction in scan times but did not significantly reduce room times. Conclusion DLR methods were associated with reductions in scan and room times in a clinical setting, though the effects were heterogeneous depending on examination type. Thus, potential adopters should carefully evaluate their case mix to determine the impact of integrating these tools. Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction, Reconstruction Algorithms, DICOM-based Reconstruction, k-Space-based Reconstruction © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by GharehMohammadi in this issue.

Citing Articles

Large language models for structured reporting in radiology: past, present, and future.

Busch F, Hoffmann L, Pinto Dos Santos D, Makowski M, Saba L, Prucker P Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39438330 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11107-6.


Efficient Health Care: Decreasing MRI Scan Time.

Gharehmohammadi F, Sebro R Radiol Artif Intell. 2024; 6(3):e240174.

PMID: 38691009 PMC: 11140514. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.240174.

References
1.
Recht M, Macari M, Lawson K, Mulholland T, Chen D, Kim D . Impacting key performance indicators in an academic MR imaging department through process improvement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2012; 10(3):202-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.08.008. View

2.
Iglehart J . Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(10):1030-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhpr0808703. View

3.
Gassenmaier S, Afat S, Nickel D, Mostapha M, Herrmann J, Othman A . Deep learning-accelerated T2-weighted imaging of the prostate: Reduction of acquisition time and improvement of image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2021; 137:109600. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109600. View

4.
Levin D, Rao V, Parker L . Trends in outpatient MRI seem to reflect recent reimbursement cuts. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 12(5):463-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.018. View

5.
Ye J . Compressed sensing MRI: a review from signal processing perspective. BMC Biomed Eng. 2020; 1:8. PMC: 7412677. DOI: 10.1186/s42490-019-0006-z. View