» Articles » PMID: 38505520

Insights into the Cell Fate Decision-making Processes from Chromosome Structural Reorganizations

Overview
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2024 Mar 20
PMID 38505520
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cell fate decision-making process, which provides the capability of a cell transition to a new cell type, involves the reorganizations of 3D genome structures. Currently, the high temporal resolution picture of how the chromosome structural rearrangements occur and further influence the gene activities during the cell-state transition is still challenging to acquire. Here, we study the chromosome structural reorganizations during the cell-state transitions among the pluripotent embryonic stem cell, the terminally differentiated normal cell, and the cancer cell using a nonequilibrium landscape-switching model implemented in the molecular dynamics simulation. We quantify the chromosome (de)compaction pathways during the cell-state transitions and find that the two pathways having the same destinations can merge prior to reaching the final states. The chromosomes at the merging states have similar structural geometries but can differ in long-range compartment segregation and spatial distribution of the chromosomal loci and genes, leading to cell-type-specific transition mechanisms. We identify the irreversible pathways of chromosome structural rearrangements during the forward and reverse transitions connecting the same pair of cell states, underscoring the critical roles of nonequilibrium dynamics in the cell-state transitions. Our results contribute to the understanding of the cell fate decision-making processes from the chromosome structural perspective.

Citing Articles

Quantifying the large-scale chromosome structural dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition of cell cycle.

Chu X, Wang J Open Biol. 2023; 13(11):230175.

PMID: 37907089 PMC: 10618054. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.230175.


Large-scale data-driven and physics-based models offer insights into the relationships among the structures, dynamics, and functions of chromosomes.

Feng C, Wang J, Chu X J Mol Cell Biol. 2023; 15(6).

PMID: 37365687 PMC: 10782906. DOI: 10.1093/jmcb/mjad042.


Dynamics and Pathways of Chromosome Structural Organizations during Cell Transdifferentiation.

Chu X, Wang J JACS Au. 2022; 2(1):116-127.

PMID: 35098228 PMC: 8791059. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.1c00416.

References
1.
Miura H, Hiratani I . Cell cycle dynamics and developmental dynamics of the 3D genome: toward linking the two timescales. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2022; 73:101898. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.101898. View

2.
Chakraborty A, Ay F . Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data. Bioinformatics. 2017; 34(2):338-345. PMC: 8210825. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx664. View

3.
Crane E, Bian Q, McCord R, Lajoie B, Wheeler B, Ralston E . Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature. 2015; 523(7559):240-4. PMC: 4498965. DOI: 10.1038/nature14450. View

4.
Kurz A, Lampel S, Nickolenko J, Bradl J, Benner A, Zirbel R . Active and inactive genes localize preferentially in the periphery of chromosome territories. J Cell Biol. 1996; 135(5):1195-205. PMC: 2121085. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.135.5.1195. View

5.
Mirny L . The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res. 2011; 19(1):37-51. PMC: 3040307. DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9177-0. View