» Articles » PMID: 38499519

Face and Context Integration in Emotion Inference is Limited and Variable Across Categories and Individuals

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Mar 19
PMID 38499519
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to make nuanced inferences about other people's emotional states is central to social functioning. While emotion inferences can be sensitive to both facial movements and the situational context that they occur in, relatively little is understood about when these two sources of information are integrated across emotion categories and individuals. In a series of studies, we use one archival and five empirical datasets to demonstrate that people could be integrating, but that emotion inferences are just as well (and sometimes better) captured by knowledge of the situation alone, while isolated facial cues are insufficient. Further, people integrate facial cues more for categories for which they most frequently encounter facial expressions in everyday life (e.g., happiness). People are also moderately stable over time in their reliance on situational cues and integration of cues and those who reliably utilize situation cues more also have better situated emotion knowledge. These findings underscore the importance of studying variability in reliance on and integration of cues.

Citing Articles

Face and context integration in emotion inference is limited and variable across categories and individuals.

Goel S, Jara-Ettinger J, Ong D, Gendron M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2443.

PMID: 38499519 PMC: 10948792. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46670-5.

References
1.
Todorov A, Duchaine B . Reading trustworthiness in faces without recognizing faces. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008; 25(3):395-410. DOI: 10.1080/02643290802044996. View

2.
Rauthmann J, Gallardo-Pujol D, Guillaume E, Todd E, Nave C, Sherman R . The Situational Eight DIAMONDS: a taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014; 107(4):677-718. DOI: 10.1037/a0037250. View

3.
Aviezer H, Ensenberg N, Hassin R . The inherently contextualized nature of facial emotion perception. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017; 17:47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.06.006. View

4.
Vul E, Goodman N, Griffiths T, Tenenbaum J . One and done? Optimal decisions from very few samples. Cogn Sci. 2014; 38(4):599-637. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12101. View

5.
Mobbs D, Weiskopf N, Lau H, Featherstone E, Dolan R, Frith C . The Kuleshov Effect: the influence of contextual framing on emotional attributions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007; 1(2):95-106. PMC: 1810228. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsl014. View