» Articles » PMID: 17339967

The Kuleshov Effect: the Influence of Contextual Framing on Emotional Attributions

Overview
Date 2007 Mar 7
PMID 17339967
Citations 50
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Filmmakers have long recognized the importance of editing techniques to guide the audiences' perceptions and enhance the impact of a scene. We demonstrate behaviorally that pairing identical faces with either neutral or emotionally salient contextual movies, an editing technique referred to as the 'Kuleshov Effect', results in both altered attributions of facial expression and mental-state. Using functional neuroimaging (fMRI), we show that faces paired with emotional movies enhance BOLD responses in the bilateral temporal pole, anterior cingulate cortices, amygdala and bilateral superior temporal sulcus relative to identical faces juxtaposed with neutral movies. An interaction was observed in the right amygdala when subtle happy and fear faces were juxtaposed with positive and negative movies, respectively. An interaction between happy faces and negative context was also observed in bilateral amygdala suggesting that the amygdala may act to prime or tag affective value to faces. A parametric modulation of BOLD signal by attribution ratings indicated a dissociation between ventrolateral and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex for negative and positive contextually evoked attributions, respectively. These prefrontal regions may act to guide appropriate choices across altering contexts. Together, these findings offer a neurobiological basis for contextual framing effects on social attributions.

Citing Articles

Emotional event perception is related to lexical complexity and emotion knowledge.

Li Z, Lu H, Liu D, Yu A, Gendron M Commun Psychol. 2024; 1(1):45.

PMID: 39242918 PMC: 11332234. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00039-4.


Reexamining the Kuleshov effect: Behavioral and neural evidence from authentic film experiments.

Cao Z, Wang Y, Wu L, Xie Y, Shi Z, Zhong Y PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0308295.

PMID: 39102395 PMC: 11299807. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308295.


Face and context integration in emotion inference is limited and variable across categories and individuals.

Goel S, Jara-Ettinger J, Ong D, Gendron M Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2443.

PMID: 38499519 PMC: 10948792. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46670-5.


Influence of transient emotional episodes on affective and cognitive theory of mind.

Qiao-Tasserit E, Corradi-DellAcqua C, Vuilleumier P Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 38442706 PMC: 10914405. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae016.


Perceptual oddities: assessing the relationship between film editing and prediction processes.

Drew A, Soto-Faraco S Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023; 379(1895):20220426.

PMID: 38104604 PMC: 10725757. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0426.


References
1.
den Ouden H, Frith U, Frith C, Blakemore S . Thinking about intentions. Neuroimage. 2005; 28(4):787-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.001. View

2.
Bar M, Kassam K, Ghuman A, Boshyan J, Schmid A, Schmidt A . Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(2):449-54. PMC: 1326160. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0507062103. View

3.
Winston J, Strange B, ODoherty J, Dolan R . Automatic and intentional brain responses during evaluation of trustworthiness of faces. Nat Neurosci. 2002; 5(3):277-83. DOI: 10.1038/nn816. View

4.
Adolphs R, Tranel D, Hamann S, Young A, Calder A, Phelps E . Recognition of facial emotion in nine individuals with bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia. 1999; 37(10):1111-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(99)00039-1. View

5.
ODoherty J, Kringelbach M, Rolls E, Hornak J, Andrews C . Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2001; 4(1):95-102. DOI: 10.1038/82959. View