» Articles » PMID: 38473684

Finite Element Analysis and Fatigue Test of INTEGRA Dental Implant System

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2024 Mar 13
PMID 38473684
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The study involved numerical FEA (finite element analysis) of dental implants. Based on this, fatigue tests were conducted according to the PN-EN 14801 standard required for the certification of dental products. Thanks to the research methodology developed by the authors, it was possible to conduct a thorough analysis of the impact of external and internal factors such as material, geometry, loading, and assembly of the dental system on the achieved value of fatigue strength limit in the examined object. For this purpose, FEM studies were based on identifying potential sites of fatigue crack initiation in reference to the results of the test conducted on a real model. The actions described in the study helped in the final evaluation of the dental system design process named by the manufacturer as INTEGRA OPTIMA 3.35. The objective of the research was to identify potential sites for fatigue crack initiation in a selected dental system built on the INTEGRA OPTIMA 3.35 set. The material used in the research was titanium grade 4. A map of reduced von Mises stresses was used to search for potential fatigue crack areas. The research [loading] was conducted on two mutually perpendicular planes positioned in such a way that the edge intersecting the planes coincided with the axis of the system. The research indicated that the connecting screw showed the least sensitivity (stress change) to the change in the loading plane, while the value of preload has a significant impact on the achieved fatigue strength of the system. In contrast, the endosteal implant (root) and the prosthetic connector showed the greatest sensitivity to the change in the loading plane. The method of mounting [securing] the endosteal implant using a holder, despite meeting the standards, may contribute to generating excessive stress concentration in the threaded part. Observation of the prosthetic connector in the Optima 3.35 system, cyclically loaded with a force of F ≈ 300 N in the area of the upper hexagonal peg, revealed a fatigue fracture. The observed change in stress peak in the dental connector for two different force application surfaces shows that the positioning of the dental system (setting of the socket in relation to the force action plane) is significantly decisive in estimating the limited fatigue strength.

Citing Articles

Static and dynamic stress analysis of different crown materials on a titanium base abutment in an implant-supported single crown: a 3D finite element analysis.

Deste Gokay G, Oyar P, Gokcimen G, Durkan R BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):545.

PMID: 38730391 PMC: 11088090. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04328-0.


Mechanical and Material Analysis of 3D-Printed Temporary Materials for Implant Reconstructions-A Pilot Study.

Nowicki A, Osypko K, Kurzawa A, Roszak M, Krawiec K, Pyka D Biomedicines. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38672224 PMC: 11048395. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040870.

References
1.
Park J, Baek C, Heo S, Kim S, Koak J, Kim S . An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32(2):350-355. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5295. View

2.
Pesqueira A, Coelho Goiato M, Filho H, Monteiro D, Dos Santos D, Haddad M . Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40(2):217-28. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00066. View

3.
Joda T, Voumard B, Zysset P, Bragger U, Ferrari M . Ultimate force and stiffness of 2-piece zirconium dioxide implants with screw-retained monolithic lithium-disilicate reconstructions. J Prosthodont Res. 2017; 62(2):258-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.11.002. View

4.
Klein M, Schiegnitz E, Al-Nawas B . Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014; 29 Suppl:43-54. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.3. View

5.
Mijiritsky E, Mazor Z, Lorean A, Levin L . Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer. Implant Dent. 2013; 22(4):394-8. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0. View