» Articles » PMID: 38454424

Design and Validation of a Conceptual Model Regarding Impact of Open Science on Healthcare Research Processes

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Mar 8
PMID 38454424
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The development and use of digital tools in various stages of research highlight the importance of novel open science methods for an integrated and accessible research system. The objective of this study was to design and validate a conceptual model of open science on healthcare research processes.

Methods: This research was conducted in three phases using a mixed-methods approach. The first phase employed a qualitative method, namely purposive sampling and semi-structured interview guides to collect data from healthcare researchers and managers. Influential factors of open science on research processes were extracted for refining the components and developing the proposed model; the second phase utilized a panel of experts and collective agreement through purposive sampling. The final phase involved purposive sampling and Delphi technique to validate the components of the proposed model according to researchers' perspectives.

Findings: From the thematic analysis of 20 interview on the study topic, 385 codes, 38 sub-themes, and 14 main themes were extracted for the initial proposed model. These components were reviewed by expert panel members, resulting in 31 sub-themes, 13 main themes, and 4 approved themes. Ultimately, the agreed-upon model was assessed in four layers for validation by the expert panel, and all the components achieved a score of > 75% in two Delphi rounds. The validated model was presented based on the infrastructure and culture layers, as well as supervision, assessment, publication, and sharing.

Conclusion: To effectively implement these methods in the research process, it is essential to create cultural and infrastructural backgrounds and predefined requirements for preventing potential abuses and privacy concerns in the healthcare system. Applying these principles will lead to greater access to outputs, increasing the credibility of research results and the utilization of collective intelligence in solving healthcare system issues.

References
1.
Payne P, Lele O, Johnson B, Holve E . Enabling Open Science for Health Research: Collaborative Informatics Environment for Learning on Health Outcomes (CIELO). J Med Internet Res. 2017; 19(7):e276. PMC: 5556258. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6937. View

2.
Chu H, Hwang G . A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Syst Appl. 2020; 34(4):2826-2840. PMC: 7127119. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034. View

3.
Murphy M, Black N, Lamping D, McKEE C, Sanderson C, Askham J . Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technol Assess. 1998; 2(3):i-iv, 1-88. View

4.
Bezuidenhout L, Quick R, Shanahan H . "Ethics When You Least Expect It": A Modular Approach to Short Course Data Ethics Instruction. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020; 26(4):2189-2213. PMC: 7417416. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00197-2. View

5.
Fry M, BURR G . Using the Delphi technique to design a self-reporting triage survey tool. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2002; 9(4):235-41. DOI: 10.1054/aaen.2001.0245. View