» Articles » PMID: 33717315

Openness in Big Data and Data Repositories: The Application of an Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2021 Mar 15
PMID 33717315
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a growing expectation, or even requirement, for researchers to deposit a variety of research data in data repositories as a condition of funding or publication. This expectation recognizes the enormous benefits of data collected and created for research purposes being made available for secondary uses, as open science gains increasing support. This is particularly so in the context of big data, especially where health data is involved. There are, however, also challenges relating to the collection, storage, and re-use of research data. This paper gives a brief overview of the landscape of data sharing via data repositories and discusses some of the key ethical issues raised by the sharing of health-related research data, including expectations of privacy and confidentiality, the transparency of repository governance structures, access restrictions, as well as data ownership and the fair attribution of credit. To consider these issues and the values that are pertinent, the paper applies the deliberative balancing approach articulated in the (Xafis et al. 2019) to the domain of Openness in Big Data and Data Repositories. Please refer to that article for more information on how this framework is to be used, including a full explanation of the key values involved and the balancing approach used in the case study at the end.

Citing Articles

Public perspectives on increased data sharing in health research in the context of the 2023 National Institutes of Health Data Sharing Policy.

Nino de Rivera S, Masterson Creber R, Zhao Y, Eslami S, Mangal S, Dugdale L PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0309161.

PMID: 39197051 PMC: 11357082. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309161.


Public Involvement and Engagement in Big Data Research: Scoping Review.

Teodorowski P, Jones E, Tahir N, Ahmed S, Rodgers S, Frith L J Particip Med. 2024; 16:e56673.

PMID: 39150751 PMC: 11364952. DOI: 10.2196/56673.


A call for open science in forensics.

Albright T, Scurich N Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(24):e2321809121.

PMID: 38781227 PMC: 11181113. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2321809121.


Design and validation of a conceptual model regarding impact of open science on healthcare research processes.

Zarghani M, Nemati-Anaraki L, Sedghi S, Chakoli A, Rowhani-Farid A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):309.

PMID: 38454424 PMC: 10921571. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10764-z.


Standardizing digital biobanks: integrating imaging, genomic, and clinical data for precision medicine.

Brancato V, Esposito G, Coppola L, Cavaliere C, Mirabelli P, Scapicchio C J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):136.

PMID: 38317237 PMC: 10845786. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-04891-8.


References
1.
Ioannidis J . Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA. 2005; 294(2):218-28. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.2.218. View

2.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

3.
Taichman D, Backus J, Baethge C, Bauchner H, de Leeuw P, Drazen J . Sharing Clinical Trial Data--A Proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(4):384-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe1515172. View

4.
Erlich Y, Shor T, Peer I, Carmi S . Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches. Science. 2018; 362(6415):690-694. PMC: 7549546. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau4832. View

5.
Longo D, Drazen J . Data Sharing. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(3):276-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMe1516564. View