» Articles » PMID: 31691858

Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2019 Nov 7
PMID 31691858
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scholarly publishers can help to increase data quality and reproducible research by promoting transparency and openness. Increasing transparency can be achieved by publishers in six key areas: (1) understanding researchers' problems and motivations, by conducting and responding to the findings of surveys; (2) raising awareness of issues and encouraging behavioural and cultural change, by introducing consistent journal policies on sharing research data, code and materials; (3) improving the quality and objectivity of the peer-review process by implementing reporting guidelines and checklists and using technology to identify misconduct; (4) improving scholarly communication infrastructure with journals that publish all scientifically sound research, promoting study registration, partnering with data repositories and providing services that improve data sharing and data curation; (5) increasing incentives for practising open research with data journals and software journals and implementing data citation and badges for transparency; and (6) making research communication more open and accessible, with open-access publishing options, permitting text and data mining and sharing publisher data and metadata and through industry and community collaboration. This chapter describes practical approaches being taken by publishers, in these six areas, their progress and effectiveness and the implications for researchers publishing their work.

Citing Articles

Design and validation of a conceptual model regarding impact of open science on healthcare research processes.

Zarghani M, Nemati-Anaraki L, Sedghi S, Chakoli A, Rowhani-Farid A BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):309.

PMID: 38454424 PMC: 10921571. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10764-z.


Trends in the sample size, statistics, and contributions to the BrainMap database of activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses: An empirical study of 10-year data.

Yeung A, Robertson M, Uecker A, Fox P, Eickhoff S Hum Brain Mapp. 2022; 44(5):1876-1887.

PMID: 36479854 PMC: 9980884. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26177.


A survey of researchers' code sharing and code reuse practices, and assessment of interactive notebook prototypes.

Cadwallader L, Hrynaszkiewicz I PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13933.

PMID: 36032954 PMC: 9406794. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13933.


EBRAINS Live Papers - Interactive Resource Sheets for Computational Studies in Neuroscience.

Appukuttan S, Bologna L, Schurmann F, Migliore M, Davison A Neuroinformatics. 2022; 21(1):101-113.

PMID: 35986836 PMC: 9931781. DOI: 10.1007/s12021-022-09598-z.


The role of metadata in reproducible computational research.

Leipzig J, Nust D, Hoyt C, Ram K, Greenberg J Patterns (N Y). 2021; 2(9):100322.

PMID: 34553169 PMC: 8441584. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100322.