» Articles » PMID: 38443487

A Systematic Review of the Methodology of Trade-off Analysis in Agriculture

Overview
Journal Nat Food
Date 2024 Mar 5
PMID 38443487
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Trade-off analysis (TOA) is central to policy and decision-making aimed at promoting sustainable agricultural landscapes. Yet, a generic methodological framework to assess trade-offs in agriculture is absent, largely due to the wide range of research disciplines and objectives for which TOA is used. In this study, we systematically reviewed 119 studies that have implemented TOAs in landscapes and regions dominated by agricultural systems around the world. Our results highlight that TOAs tend to be unbalanced, with a strong emphasis on productivity rather than environmental and socio-cultural services. TOAs have mostly been performed at farm or regional scales, rarely considering multiple spatial scales simultaneously. Mostly, TOAs fail to include stakeholders at study development stage, disregard recommendation uncertainty due to outcome variability and overlook risks associated with the TOA outcomes. Increased attention to these aspects is critical for TOAs to guide agricultural landscapes towards sustainability.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of Feedlot and Free-range cattle management on Botswana beef quality: a study of sustainability, post-mortem examination, and SWOT analysis.

Parsons B, Makore J, Motube B, Rakobe G, Ramabu S Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025; 57(2):109.

PMID: 40059244 PMC: 11891096. DOI: 10.1007/s11250-025-04355-1.


Bundled measures for China's food system transformation reveal social and environmental co-benefits.

Wang X, Cai H, Xuan J, Du R, Lin B, Bodirsky B Nat Food. 2025; 6(1):72-84.

PMID: 39838133 DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01100-z.


Governance and resilience as entry points for transforming food systems in the countdown to 2030.

Schneider K, Remans R, Bekele T, Aytekin D, Conforti P, Dasgupta S Nat Food. 2025; 6(1):105-116.

PMID: 39810054 PMC: 11772237. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-024-01109-4.

References
1.
Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Guston D . Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100(14):8086-91. PMC: 166186. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100. View

2.
Sanon S, Hein T, Douven W, Winkler P . Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. J Environ Manage. 2012; 111:159-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008. View

3.
Prestele R, Verburg P . The overlooked spatial dimension of climate-smart agriculture. Glob Chang Biol. 2019; 26(3):1045-1054. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14940. View

4.
Groot J, Rossing W, Tichit M, Turpin N, Jellema A, Baudry J . On the contribution of modelling to multifunctional agriculture: learning from comparisons. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90 Suppl 2:S147-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.030. View

5.
Renting H, Rossing W, Groot J, Van der Ploeg J, Laurent C, Perraud D . Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90 Suppl 2:S112-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.014. View