» Articles » PMID: 21321211

Global Land Use Change, Economic Globalization, and the Looming Land Scarcity

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2011 Feb 16
PMID 21321211
Citations 218
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A central challenge for sustainability is how to preserve forest ecosystems and the services that they provide us while enhancing food production. This challenge for developing countries confronts the force of economic globalization, which seeks cropland that is shrinking in availability and triggers deforestation. Four mechanisms-the displacement, rebound, cascade, and remittance effects-that are amplified by economic globalization accelerate land conversion. A few developing countries have managed a land use transition over the recent decades that simultaneously increased their forest cover and agricultural production. These countries have relied on various mixes of agricultural intensification, land use zoning, forest protection, increased reliance on imported food and wood products, the creation of off-farm jobs, foreign capital investments, and remittances. Sound policies and innovations can therefore reconcile forest preservation with food production. Globalization can be harnessed to increase land use efficiency rather than leading to uncontrolled land use expansion. To do so, land systems should be understood and modeled as open systems with large flows of goods, people, and capital that connect local land use with global-scale factors.

Citing Articles

Pressure on Global Forests: Implications of Rising Vegetable Oils Consumption Under the EAT-Lancet Diet.

Chiriaco M, Galli N, Latella M, Rulli M Glob Chang Biol. 2025; 31(2):e70077.

PMID: 39973664 PMC: 11840662. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70077.


Nonnegligible cascading impacts of global urban expansion on net primary productivity.

Liu K, Pei F, Liu X, Zeng Z, Zhu P, Fang C PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(1).

PMID: 39871827 PMC: 11770600. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae220.


Effects of urban sprawl due to migration on spatiotemporal land use-land cover change: a case study of Bartın in Türkiye.

Sen G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):815.

PMID: 39755873 PMC: 11700173. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85353-z.


Land use land cover change as a casual factor for climate variability and trends in the Bilate River Basin, Ethiopia.

Bikeko S, Venkatesham D PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0311961.

PMID: 39739943 PMC: 11687893. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311961.


From tradition to smart: A comprehensive review of the evolution and prospects of land use planning tools.

Liu Y, Timo de Vries W, Zhang G, Cui X Heliyon. 2024; 10(23):e40857.

PMID: 39717574 PMC: 11665401. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40857.


References
1.
Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton R, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J . Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science. 2008; 319(5867):1238-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.1151861. View

2.
Curran L, Trigg S, McDonald A, Astiani D, Hardiono Y, Siregar P . Lowland forest loss in protected areas of Indonesian Borneo. Science. 2004; 303(5660):1000-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091714. View

3.
Meyfroidt P, Rudel T, Lambin E . Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(49):20917-22. PMC: 3000287. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1014773107. View

4.
Andam K, Ferraro P, Pfaff A, Sanchez-Azofeifa G, Robalino J . Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(42):16089-94. PMC: 2567237. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800437105. View

5.
Melillo J, Reilly J, Kicklighter D, Gurgel A, Cronin T, Paltsev S . Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important?. Science. 2009; 326(5958):1397-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1180251. View