» Articles » PMID: 38408993

Goal Pursuit Increases More After Dietary Success Than After Dietary Failure: Examining Conflicting Theories of Self-regulation Using Ecological Momentary Assessment

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Maintaining a healthy body weight and reaching long-term dietary goals requires ongoing self-monitoring and behavioral adjustments. How individuals respond to successes and failures is described in models of self-regulation: while cybernetic models propose that failures lead to increased self-regulatory efforts and successes permit a reduction of such efforts, motivational models (e.g., social-cognitive theory) make opposite predictions. Here, we tested these conflicting models in an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) context and explored whether effort adjustments are related to inter-individual differences in perceived self-regulatory success in dieting (i.e., weight management).

Methods: Using linear mixed effects models, we tested in 174 diet-interested individuals whether current day dietary success or failure (e.g., on Monday) was followed by self-regulatory effort adjustment for the next day (e.g., on Tuesday) across 14 days. Success vs. failure was operationalized with two EMA items: first, whether food intake was higher vs. lower than usual and second, whether food intake was perceived as more vs. less goal-congruent than usual. Trait-level perceived self-regulatory success in dieting was measured on a questionnaire.

Results: Intended self-regulatory effort increased more strongly after days with dietary success (i.e., eating less than usual / rating intake as goal-congruent) than after days with dietary failure (i.e., eating more than usual / rating intake as goal-incongruent), especially in those individuals with lower scores on perceived self-regulatory success in dieting.

Conclusions: Findings support mechanisms proposed by social-cognitive theory, especially in unsuccessful dieters. Thus, future dietary interventions could focus on preventing the decrease in self-regulatory effort after instances of dietary failures and thereby mitigate the potential risk that a single dietary failure initiates a downward spiral into unhealthy eating.

References
1.
Conner M, Sheeran P, Norman P, Armitage C . Temporal stability as a moderator of relationships in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001; 39 Pt 4:469-93. DOI: 10.1348/014466600164598. View

2.
Anderson E, Winett R, Wojcik J . Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Ann Behav Med. 2007; 34(3):304-12. DOI: 10.1007/BF02874555. View

3.
Weiner B . An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychol Rev. 1985; 92(4):548-73. View

4.
Prinsen S, Evers C, de Ridder D . Justified indulgence: self-licensing effects on caloric consumption. Psychol Health. 2018; 34(1):24-43. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1508683. View

5.
Anderson E, Winett R, Wojcik J . Social-cognitive determinants of nutrition behavior among supermarket food shoppers: a structural equation analysis. Health Psychol. 2000; 19(5):479-86. View