» Articles » PMID: 33422046

Networks of Stress, Affect and Eating Behaviour: Anticipated Stress Coping Predicts Goal-congruent Eating in Young Adults

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2021 Jan 10
PMID 33422046
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many people aim to eat healthily. Yet, affluent food environments encourage consumption of energy dense and nutrient-poor foods, making it difficult to accomplish individual goals such as maintaining a healthy diet and weight. Moreover, goal-congruent eating might be influenced by affects, stress and intense food cravings and might also impinge on these in turn. Directionality and interrelations of these variables are currently unclear, which impedes targeted intervention. Psychological network models offer an exploratory approach that might be helpful to identify unique associations between numerous variables as well as their directionality when based on longitudinal time-series data.

Methods: Across 14 days, 84 diet-interested participants (age range: 18-38 years, 85.7% female, mostly recruited via universities) reported their momentary states as well as retrospective eating episodes four times a day. We used multilevel vector autoregressive network models based on ecological momentary assessment data of momentary affects, perceived stress and stress coping, hunger, food craving as well as goal-congruent eating behaviour.

Results: Neither of the momentary measures of stress (experience of stress or stress coping), momentary affects or craving uniquely predicted goal-congruent eating. Yet, temporal effects indicated that higher anticipated stress coping predicted subsequent goal-congruent eating. Thus, the more confident participants were in their coping with upcoming challenges, the more they ate in line with their goals.

Conclusion: Most eating behaviour interventions focus on hunger and craving alongside negative and positive affect, thereby overlooking additional important variables like stress coping. Furthermore, self-regulation of eating behaviours seems to be represented by how much someone perceives a particular eating episode as matching their individual eating goal. To conclude, stress coping might be a potential novel intervention target for eating related Just-In-Time Adaptive Interventions in the context of intensive longitudinal assessment.

Citing Articles

Goal pursuit increases more after dietary success than after dietary failure: examining conflicting theories of self-regulation using ecological momentary assessment.

van Alebeek H, Jones C, Reichenberger J, Pannicke B, Schuz B, Blechert J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):24.

PMID: 38408993 PMC: 10895756. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01566-x.


Effectiveness of a text-messaging intervention on intuitive eating: a randomised controlled trial.

Manana B, El-Jor C, Kharma J, Zeeni N Public Health Nutr. 2023; 26(8):1576-1584.

PMID: 37165660 PMC: 10410380. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980023000939.


The Use of Mobile-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment (mEMA) Methodology to Assess Dietary Intake, Food Consumption Behaviours and Context in Young People: A Systematic Review.

Battaglia B, Lee L, Jia S, Partridge S, Allman-Farinelli M Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(7).

PMID: 35885855 PMC: 9321045. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071329.


Clustering individuals' temporal patterns of affective states, hunger, and food craving by latent class vector-autoregression.

Pannicke B, Blechert J, Reichenberger J, Kaiser T Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022; 19(1):57.

PMID: 35597952 PMC: 9123755. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-022-01293-1.


Analysis of Self-Regulation of Eating Behaviors within Polish Adolescents' COVID-19 Experience (PLACE-19) Study.

Guzek D, Skolmowska D, Glabska D Nutrients. 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35458243 PMC: 9030425. DOI: 10.3390/nu14081679.


References
1.
WATSON D, Clark L, Tellegen A . Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54(6):1063-70. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063. View

2.
Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried E . Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behav Res Methods. 2017; 50(1):195-212. PMC: 5809547. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1. View

3.
Mertens E, Markey O, Geleijnse J, Lovegrove J, Givens D . Adherence to a healthy diet in relation to cardiovascular incidence and risk markers: evidence from the Caerphilly Prospective Study. Eur J Nutr. 2017; 57(3):1245-1258. PMC: 5861161. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-017-1408-0. View

4.
Coccurello R, Maccarrone M . Hedonic Eating and the "Delicious Circle": From Lipid-Derived Mediators to Brain Dopamine and Back. Front Neurosci. 2018; 12:271. PMC: 5928395. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00271. View

5.
Cleobury L, Tapper K . Reasons for eating 'unhealthy' snacks in overweight and obese males and females. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2013; 27(4):333-41. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12169. View