» Articles » PMID: 38408938

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Digital Technologies in Mental Health Systems: a Qualitative Systematic Review to Inform a Policy Framework

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 Feb 26
PMID 38408938
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the potential for improved population mental health and wellbeing, the integration of mental health digital interventions has been difficult to achieve. In this qualitative systematic review, we aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental healthcare systems, and map these to an implementation framework to inform policy development.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for primary research articles published between January 2010 and 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they reported barriers and/or facilitators to the integration of any digital mental healthcare technologies. Data were extracted using EPPI-Reviewer Web and analysed thematically via inductive and deductive cycles.

Results: Of 12,525 references identified initially, 81 studies were included in the final analysis. Barriers and facilitators were grouped within an implementation (evidence-practice gap) framework across six domains, organised by four levels of mental healthcare systems. Broadly, implementation was hindered by the perception of digital technologies as impersonal tools that add additional burden of care onto both providers and patients, and change relational power asymmetries; an absence of resources; and regulatory complexities that impede access to universal coverage. Facilitators included person-cantered approaches that consider patients' intersectional features e.g., gender, class, disability, illness severity; evidence-based training for providers; collaboration among colleagues; appropriate investment in human and financial resources; and policy reforms that tackle universal access to digital health.

Conclusion: It is important to consider the complex and interrelated nature of barriers across different domains and levels of the mental health system. To facilitate the equitable, sustainable, and long-term digital transition of mental health systems, policymakers should consider a systemic approach to collaboration between public and private sectors to inform evidence-based planning and strengthen mental health systems.

Protocol Registration: The protocol is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42021276838.

Citing Articles

The Impact of Virtual Consultations on Quality of Care for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Aldakhil R, Greenfield G, Lammila-Escalera E, Laranjo L, Hayhoe B, Majeed A J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251316585.

PMID: 39960237 PMC: 11833803. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251316585.


Individual differences in treatment effects of internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care: a moderation analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Hyland K, Romero D, Andreasson S, Hammarberg A, Hedman-Lagerlof E, Johansson M Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2025; 20(1):17.

PMID: 39953626 PMC: 11827356. DOI: 10.1186/s13722-025-00546-1.


Understanding Individual Differences in Happiness Sources and Implications for Health Technology Design: Exploratory Analysis of an Open Dataset.

Ennis E, Bond R, Mulvenna M, Sweeney C JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e65658.

PMID: 39879609 PMC: 11822315. DOI: 10.2196/65658.


Improving Mental Health and Well-Being Through the Paradym App: Quantitative Study of Real-World Data.

Metaxa A, Liverpool S, Eisenstadt M, Pollard J, Carlsson C JMIR Form Res. 2025; 9:e68031.

PMID: 39848610 PMC: 11803330. DOI: 10.2196/68031.


Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions for Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Christy A, Fernanda F, Insani W, Abdulah R J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025; 18():101-112.

PMID: 39822966 PMC: 11735830. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S494584.


References
1.
Landes S, Pitcock J, Harned M, Connolly S, Meyers L, Oliver C . Provider perspectives on delivering dialectical behavior therapy via telehealth during COVID-19 in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Psychol Serv. 2021; 19(3):562-572. PMC: 11809750. DOI: 10.1037/ser0000571. View

2.
Orlowski S, Lawn S, Matthews B, Venning A, Wyld K, Jones G . The promise and the reality: a mental health workforce perspective on technology-enhanced youth mental health service delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):562. PMC: 5057226. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1790-y. View

3.
Gould C, Loup J, Kuhn E, Beaudreau S, Ma F, Goldstein M . Technology use and preferences for mental health self-management interventions among older veterans. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019; 35(3):321-330. DOI: 10.1002/gps.5252. View

4.
Lattie E, Nicholas J, Knapp A, Skerl J, Kaiser S, Mohr D . Opportunities for and Tensions Surrounding the Use of Technology-Enabled Mental Health Services in Community Mental Health Care. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019; 47(1):138-149. PMC: 6946841. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00979-2. View

5.
Cochrane L, Olson C, Murray S, Dupuis M, Tooman T, Hayes S . Gaps between knowing and doing: understanding and assessing the barriers to optimal health care. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2007; 27(2):94-102. DOI: 10.1002/chp.106. View