» Articles » PMID: 30381280

Early Psychosis Service User Views on Digital Technology: Qualitative Analysis

Overview
Date 2018 Nov 2
PMID 30381280
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Digital technology has the potential to improve outcomes for people with psychosis. However, to date, research has largely ignored service user views on digital health interventions (DHIs).

Objective: The objective of our study was to explore early psychosis service users' subjective views on DHIs.

Methods: Framework analysis was undertaken with data obtained from 21 semistructured interviews with people registered with early intervention for psychosis services. Robust measures were used to develop a stable framework, including member checking, triangulation, independent verification of themes, and consensus meetings.

Results: The following 4 themes were established a priori: acceptability of technology in psychosis and mental health; technology increasing access to and augmenting mental health support; barriers to adopting DHIs; and concerns about management of data protection, privacy, risk, and security of information. The following 2 themes were generated a posteriori: blending DHIs with face-to-face treatment and empowerment, control, and choice. DHIs were also viewed as potentially destigmatizing, overcoming barriers faced in traditional service settings, facilitating communication, and empowering service users to take active control of their health care.

Conclusions: In the first study of its kind, early psychosis service users' were largely positive about the potential use of DHIs supporting and managing mental health. Overall, service users felt that DHIs were a progressive, modern, and relevant platform for health care delivery. Concerns were expressed around privacy and data security and practical barriers inherent within DHIs, all of which require further attention. Future research should explore whether findings transfer to other service user groups, other technology delivery formats, and across a range of treatment modalities.

Citing Articles

Barriers and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.

Eisner E, Faulkner S, Allan S, Ball H, Di Basilio D, Nicholas J JMIR Ment Health. 2025; 12:e65246.

PMID: 39832352 PMC: 11791459. DOI: 10.2196/65246.


Healthcare Professionals' Views on the Use of Passive Sensing and Machine Learning Approaches in Secondary Mental Healthcare: A Qualitative Study.

Rogan J, Firth J, Bucci S Health Expect. 2024; 27(6):e70116.

PMID: 39587845 PMC: 11589162. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70116.


Acceptability and experience of a smartphone symptom monitoring app for people with psychosis in China (YouXin): a qualitative study.

Zhang X, Lewis S, Chen X, Zhou J, Wang X, Bucci S BMC Psychiatry. 2024; 24(1):268.

PMID: 38594713 PMC: 11003104. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05687-2.


Eliciting perspectives on remote healthcare delivery from service users with psychosis in the community: a cross-sectional survey study.

Kuhn R, Abdel-Halim N, Healey P, Bird V, Elliot K, McNamee P Front Digit Health. 2024; 6:1304456.

PMID: 38414715 PMC: 10897019. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304456.


Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework.

Berardi C, Antonini M, Jordan Z, Wechtler H, Paolucci F, Hinwood M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):243.

PMID: 38408938 PMC: 10898174. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1.


References
1.
Proudfoot J, Parker G, Pavlovic D, Manicavasagar V, Adler E, Whitton A . Community attitudes to the appropriation of mobile phones for monitoring and managing depression, anxiety, and stress. J Med Internet Res. 2010; 12(5):e64. PMC: 3057321. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1475. View

2.
Bell I, Lim M, Rossell S, Thomas N . Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention in the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review. Psychiatr Serv. 2017; 68(11):1172-1181. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600523. View

3.
Salzer M, Brusilovskiy E, Prvu-Bettger J, Kottsieper P . Measuring community participation of adults with psychiatric disabilities: reliability of two modes of data collection. Rehabil Psychol. 2014; 59(2):211-219. DOI: 10.1037/a0036002. View

4.
Killikelly C, He Z, Reeder C, Wykes T . Improving Adherence to Web-Based and Mobile Technologies for People With Psychosis: Systematic Review of New Potential Predictors of Adherence. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(7):e94. PMC: 5544896. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7088. View

5.
Beebe L, Smith K, Crye C, Addonizio C, Strunk D, Martin W . Telenursing intervention increases psychiatric medication adherence in schizophrenia outpatients. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2011; 14(3):217-24. DOI: 10.1177/1078390308318750. View