» Articles » PMID: 26466894

Implementing Electronic Patient Record Systems (EPRs) into England's Acute, Mental Health and Community Care Trusts: a Mixed Methods Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Oct 16
PMID 26466894
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Our aim was to explore the approaches to and the challenges and benefits of implementing Electronic Patient Record systems (EPRs) into NHS acute, mental health and community care hospitals throughout England.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was adopted that comprised an online survey (n = 59) and semi-structured telephone interviews (n = 8) with chief information officers (or heads of EPR projects) at NHS trusts throughout England. Survey analysis was descriptive, whilst the qualitative interviews were analysed thematically.

Results: A range of devices and approaches to implementing EPRs were described with 32 % of survey respondents utilising a best of breed approach. Interviewees' perceived and expected benefits of implementing an EPR included efficiency, availability and accessibility of clinical information, and patient safety. Key challenges to EPR implementation were securing clinician involvement, difficulties posed by government and national policy and limited availability of financial and human resources.

Conclusions: There was no single approach regarding the approaches taken to implementing EPRs among participating English NHS trusts, with various benefits and challenges cited. Policymakers and researchers need to provide clearer guidance for trusts at various stages of implementation ensuring intelligence is shared across England's NHS trusts.

Citing Articles

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of digital technologies in mental health systems: a qualitative systematic review to inform a policy framework.

Berardi C, Antonini M, Jordan Z, Wechtler H, Paolucci F, Hinwood M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):243.

PMID: 38408938 PMC: 10898174. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10536-1.


Implementing a Digital Tool to Support Shared Care Planning in Community-Based Mental Health Services: Qualitative Evaluation.

Pithara C, Farr M, Sullivan S, Edwards H, Hall W, Gadd C J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(3):e14868.

PMID: 32191210 PMC: 7118546. DOI: 10.2196/14868.


Digital maturity: are we ready to use technology in the NHS?.

Johnston D Future Healthc J. 2019; 4(3):189-192.

PMID: 31098469 PMC: 6502583. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.4-3-189.


Qualitative study exploring the phenomenon of multiple electronic prescribing systems within single hospital organisations.

Ahmed Z, Jani Y, Franklin B BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):969.

PMID: 30547779 PMC: 6295095. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-3750-1.


Challenges of using Hospital Information Systems by nurses: comparing academic and non-academic hospitals.

Ahmadian L, Dorosti N, Khajouei R, Gohari S Electron Physician. 2017; 9(6):4625-4630.

PMID: 28848639 PMC: 5557144. DOI: 10.19082/4625.


References
1.
Jaana M, Ward M, Bahensky J . EMRs and clinical IS implementation in hospitals: a statewide survey. J Rural Health. 2012; 28(1):34-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00386.x. View

2.
Boyer L, Samuelian J, Fieschi M, Lancon C . Implementing electronic medical records in a psychiatric hospital: A qualitative study. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2014; 14(3):223-7. DOI: 10.3109/13651501003717243. View

3.
Cresswell K, Worth A, Sheikh A . Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012; 12:15. PMC: 3313868. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-15. View

4.
Pagliari C, Detmer D, Singleton P . Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ. 2007; 335(7615):330-3. PMC: 1949437. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39279.482963.AD. View

5.
Takian A, Sheikh A, Barber N . We are bitter, but we are better off: case study of the implementation of an electronic health record system into a mental health hospital in England. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 12:484. PMC: 3545968. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-484. View