Phage-assisted Evolution of Highly Active Cytosine Base Editors with Enhanced Selectivity and Minimal Sequence Context Preference

Overview

Journal Nat Commun

Specialty Biology

Date 2024 Feb 24

PMID 38402281

Authors

Emily Zhang

Monica E Neugebauer

Nicholas A Krasnow

David R Liu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

TadA-derived cytosine base editors (TadCBEs) enable programmable C•G-to-T•A editing while retaining the small size, high on-target activity, and low off-target activity of TadA deaminases. Existing TadCBEs, however, exhibit residual A•T-to-G•C editing at certain positions and lower editing efficiencies at some sequence contexts and with non-SpCas9 targeting domains. To address these limitations, we use phage-assisted evolution to evolve CBE6s from a TadA-mediated dual cytosine and adenine base editor, discovering mutations at N46 and Y73 in TadA that prevent A•T-to-G•C editing and improve C•G-to-T•A editing with expanded sequence-context compatibility, respectively. In E. coli, CBE6 variants offer high C•G-to-T•A editing and no detected A•T-to-G•C editing in any sequence context. In human cells, CBE6 variants exhibit broad Cas domain compatibility and retain low off-target editing despite exceeding BE4max and previous TadCBEs in on-target editing efficiency. Finally, we show that the high selectivity of CBE6 variants is well-suited for therapeutically relevant stop codon installation without creating unwanted missense mutations from residual A•T-to-G•C editing.

Citing Articles

Multiplexed base editing identifies functional gene-variant-context interactions.

Acosta J, Johnson G, Gould S, Dong K, Lendner Y, Detres D bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060482 PMC: 11888363. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.23.639770.

Engineering a bacterial toxin deaminase from the DYW-family into a novel cytosine base editor for plants and mammalian cells.

Zhang D, Parth F, da Silva L, Ha T, Schambach A, Boch J Genome Biol. 2025; 26(1):18.

PMID: 39901278 PMC: 11789416. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-025-03478-w.

Precision engineering of the probiotic Nissle 1917 with prime editing.

Chen P, Wei Y, Li X, Yu H, Wang S, Yuan X Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025; 91(2):e0003125.

PMID: 39887239 PMC: 11837520. DOI: 10.1128/aem.00031-25.

Precise modelling of mitochondrial diseases using optimized mitoBEs.

Zhang X, Zhang X, Ren J, Li J, Wei X, Yu Y Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 39843744 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08469-8.

Engineering TadA ortholog-derived cytosine base editor without motif preference and adenosine activity limitation.

Li G, Dong X, Luo J, Yuan T, Li T, Zhao G Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8090.

PMID: 39284833 PMC: 11405849. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52485-1.

References

Esvelt K, Carlson J, Liu D . A system for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature. 2011; 472(7344):499-503. PMC: 3084352. DOI: 10.1038/nature09929. View

Chadwick A, Wang X, Musunuru K . In Vivo Base Editing of PCSK9 (Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9) as a Therapeutic Alternative to Genome Editing. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017; 37(9):1741-1747. PMC: 5570639. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309881. View

Chaudhury S, Lyskov S, Gray J . PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(5):689-91. PMC: 2828115. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq007. View

Willis J, Silva-Pinheiro P, Widdup L, Minczuk M, Liu D . Compact zinc finger base editors that edit mitochondrial or nuclear DNA in vitro and in vivo. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):7204. PMC: 9684478. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34784-7. View

Huang T, Heins Z, Miller S, Wong B, Balivada P, Wang T . High-throughput continuous evolution of compact Cas9 variants targeting single-nucleotide-pyrimidine PAMs. Nat Biotechnol. 2022; 41(1):96-107. PMC: 9849140. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01410-2. View

Ringquist S, Shinedling S, Barrick D, Green L, Binkley J, Stormo G . Translation initiation in Escherichia coli: sequences within the ribosome-binding site. Mol Microbiol. 1992; 6(9):1219-29. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01561.x. View

Anzalone A, Koblan L, Liu D . Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(7):824-844. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9. View

Miller S, Wang T, Randolph P, Arbab M, Shen M, Huang T . Continuous evolution of SpCas9 variants compatible with non-G PAMs. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(4):471-481. PMC: 7145744. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0412-8. View

Neugebauer M, Hsu A, Arbab M, Krasnow N, McElroy A, Pandey S . Evolution of an adenine base editor into a small, efficient cytosine base editor with low off-target activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2022; 41(5):673-685. PMC: 10188366. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01533-6. View

10.

Zhang C, Yang Y, Qi T, Zhang Y, Hou L, Wei J . Prediction of base editor off-targets by deep learning. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):5358. PMC: 10475126. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41004-3. View

11.

Richter M, Zhao K, Eton E, Lapinaite A, Newby G, Thuronyi B . Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(7):883-891. PMC: 7357821. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z. View

12.

Dang L, Li G, Wang X, Huang S, Zhang Y, Miao Y . Comparison of gene disruption induced by cytosine base editing-mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated frameshift. Cell Prolif. 2020; 53(5):e12820. PMC: 7260061. DOI: 10.1111/cpr.12820. View

13.

Leman J, Weitzner B, Lewis S, Adolf-Bryfogle J, Alam N, Alford R . Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks. Nat Methods. 2020; 17(7):665-680. PMC: 7603796. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2. View

14.

Fiumara M, Ferrari S, Omer-Javed A, Beretta S, Albano L, Canarutto D . Genotoxic effects of base and prime editing in human hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2023; 42(6):877-891. PMC: 11180610. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-023-01915-4. View

15.

Webber B, Lonetree C, Kluesner M, Johnson M, Pomeroy E, Diers M . Highly efficient multiplex human T cell engineering without double-strand breaks using Cas9 base editors. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):5222. PMC: 6864045. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13007-6. View

16.

Xu P, Liu Z, Liu Y, Ma H, Xu Y, Bao Y . Genome-wide interrogation of gene functions through base editor screens empowered by barcoded sgRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2021; 39(11):1403-1413. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00944-1. View

17.

Mok B, de Moraes M, Zeng J, Bosch D, Kotrys A, Raguram A . A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature. 2020; 583(7817):631-637. PMC: 7381381. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4. View

18.

Doman J, Raguram A, Newby G, Liu D . Evaluation and minimization of Cas9-independent off-target DNA editing by cytosine base editors. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(5):620-628. PMC: 7335424. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0414-6. View

19.

Komor A, Kim Y, Packer M, Zuris J, Liu D . Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 2016; 533(7603):420-4. PMC: 4873371. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946. View

20.

Newby G, Yen J, Woodard K, Mayuranathan T, Lazzarotto C, Li Y . Base editing of haematopoietic stem cells rescues sickle cell disease in mice. Nature. 2021; 595(7866):295-302. PMC: 8266759. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03609-w. View